For over a decade, cooperative schools have struck a note of discord within the highly orchestrated context of English education policy. They encapsulate an old set of ideas but re-articulate them for new times by engaging with educational frameworks which are locked into the so-called global education reform movement (GERM) based upon on standards, standardisation, a mixture of centralised and devolved accountabilities, leadership, testing and accountability. Yet cooperative schools ostensibly aim to embed a set of wide-ranging values and principles: equality, equity, democracy, self-help, self-responsibility and solidarity as well as the principles of education, democratic control and community ownership, all of which echo the history of labour movements. The cooperative legal model not only adheres to cooperative values and principles but necessitates stakeholder involvement in the governance of schools: pupils, staff, parents, community and, potentially, alumni are all expected to play a role. These are compared to David Hargreaves' ideas about a 'self-improving school system'. I analyse the emergence of the cooperative network and the reasons for its dramatic growth alongside the complex problems it faced. In turn these help us to understand the possibilities and contradictions inherent in attempts to build inclusive and democratic educational networks. For over a decade, cooperative schools have struck a note of discord within the highly orchestrated context of English education policy. They encapsulate radical and democratic ideas but re-articulate them for new times within the so-called global education reform movement (GERM) which is based upon on standards, standardisation, a mixture of centralised and devolved accountabilities, leadership, testing and accountability (Sahlberg 2012). The study of cooperative schools offers unique insights into the changing relationships between leaders and the networks in which they operate. It provides a