2011
DOI: 10.1017/s2045796011000424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cochrane Collaboration as key player in the struggle for better and more relevant patients- and system-oriented research

Abstract: The Cochrane Collaboration represents a quite successful example of a grass roots international effort aimed at contributing the growing demand for valid and reliable information on the effects of health care intervention, eagerly sought by consumers, patients, doctors and policy makers worldwide. The Cochrane Collaboration is fully aware that part of its success is due to the originality of its founding principles and that the challenge ahead is to maintain its 'Cochrane Collaboration brand' while understandi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They also need to understand patient values, preferences and their desired involvement and information, by adopting a shared approach towards therapeutic decisions. This implies to have more effective and transparent ways to produce relevant research results (Liberati, 2011) and to disseminate them in an appropriate manner (Internet may help or be harmful and its influence has to be considered more during clinical consultations). Moreover, research results and patient knowledge have to be reconciled and should emerge during the consultation in a way that is not stigmatising for the patients or their families, who also have the right and the need to be informed, educated and, whenever possible, involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also need to understand patient values, preferences and their desired involvement and information, by adopting a shared approach towards therapeutic decisions. This implies to have more effective and transparent ways to produce relevant research results (Liberati, 2011) and to disseminate them in an appropriate manner (Internet may help or be harmful and its influence has to be considered more during clinical consultations). Moreover, research results and patient knowledge have to be reconciled and should emerge during the consultation in a way that is not stigmatising for the patients or their families, who also have the right and the need to be informed, educated and, whenever possible, involved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, in response to growing concerns about the methodology followed to update the list, an approach based on a more systematic assessment of the evidence base was adopted, which included careful appraisal of efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and public-health relevance. Links with the Cochrane Collaboration were established in order to make better evidence-based decisions (Laing et al 2003; Liberati, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences three Editorials discuss the extent to which Cochrane reviews have been able to help doctors and policymakers make decisions, and whether the goal of implementing an evidence-based practice is getting closer (Adams, 2011; Davoli & Amato, 2011; Liberati, 2011). The authors of the three Editorials seem to agree that the Cochrane Collaboration represents a successful example of international effort aimed at providing an answer to the growing demand for valid and reliable information on the effects of health care interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In questo numero di Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences tre Editoriali affrontano il tema dell'impatto delle revisioni Cochrane sulla pratica clinica e sulle politiche sanitarie, con l'intento di comprendere se l'obiettivo di realizzare una pratica clinica realmente basata sulle prove di efficacia si stia concretizzando (Adams, 2011; Davoli & Amato, 2011; Liberati, 2011). Gli autori dei tre Editoriali concordano nel ritenere che la Cochrane Collaboration rappresenti un esempio positivo di come sia possibile attivare uno sforzo internazionale e spontaneo per cercare di dare risposta alla domanda crescente di informazioni valide e affidabili sugli effetti degli interventi in ambito sanitario.…”
unclassified