2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coevolution mechanism of stakeholder strategies in the recycled resources industry innovation ecosystem: the view of evolutionary game theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the spatial distribution of this comprehensive level of green innovation is heterogeneous, with cities with high levels of green innovation generating spillover and suction effects, thereby promoting the migration or gathering of surrounding green innovation subjects and elements. Using administrative boundaries, a strict hierarchical nested structure is formed in the geographical space (Hao et al, 2022; Zeng et al, 2022). With the continuous enhancement of industrial intelligence and digitization, high‐end green innovation production factors based on data storage have significantly diminished the barrier effect of spatial distance and administrative boundaries (Pushpananthan & Elmquist, 2022; Zhao et al, 2023).…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the spatial distribution of this comprehensive level of green innovation is heterogeneous, with cities with high levels of green innovation generating spillover and suction effects, thereby promoting the migration or gathering of surrounding green innovation subjects and elements. Using administrative boundaries, a strict hierarchical nested structure is formed in the geographical space (Hao et al, 2022; Zeng et al, 2022). With the continuous enhancement of industrial intelligence and digitization, high‐end green innovation production factors based on data storage have significantly diminished the barrier effect of spatial distance and administrative boundaries (Pushpananthan & Elmquist, 2022; Zhao et al, 2023).…”
Section: Theory and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a related study, game theory models can be employed to analyze the government's decisions regarding eco-innovation behavior (Bimonte et al, 2022;Fu et al, 2023;Sun et al, 2023). Adopting an evolutionary game theory perspective, we can further investigate the coevolution of stakeholder strategies within a system, explore evolutionary trajectories and system stability conditions through numerical simulations, and analyze the policy implications of government behavior (Dong et al, 2022;Hao et al, 2022;Li, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Wu et al, 2020;Zhang & Kong, 2022).…”
Section: Evolutionary Game Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the research findings of Lyapunov, if all eigenvalues of the Jacobi matrix are non-positive at the equilibrium point, that point is considered an ESS for the system (Hao et al, 2022;Li et al, 2023;Lyapunov, 1992;Ritzberger & Weibull, 1995). ESS points under information asymmetry must be pure strategy Nash equilibrium points (Friedman, 1991;Selten & Selten, 1988).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Set the dynamic equations of Enterprise 1, Enterprise 2, and the government to be zero; eight partial equilibrium solutions can be obtained [ 74 ], namely , , , , , , , and . The eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix obtained from the equilibrium points are shown in Table 7 .…”
Section: Construction and Analysis Of Evolutionary Game Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%