2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coevolution of the spread of a disease and competing opinions in multiplex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss this point in more detail in Section 3.3, where we exhibit the results of Monte Carlo simulations of the model. Equation (16) corresponds to the limit t → ∞ of the solution to Equation (17):…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We discuss this point in more detail in Section 3.3, where we exhibit the results of Monte Carlo simulations of the model. Equation (16) corresponds to the limit t → ∞ of the solution to Equation (17):…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning sociologists, these methods are useful to improve forecasting by means of controlled toy models that can be run multiple times and help fine-tune field studies as well [15]. In addition to the interesting properties of opinion dynamics models, per se, such dynamics have also been applied in various fields such as finance and business [16], and epidemic dynamics with the presence of conflicting opinions [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], among others [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include coevolving voter models [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], coevolving spin systems [ 39 , 40 ], coevolving models of opinion formation [ 41 , 42 ], epidemic models of adaptive networks [ 43 , 44 , 45 ], coevolving models of cultural evolution [ 46 , 47 ], and game theoretical models [ 48 ]. While we here focus on the coevolution of node states and network topology, there have been studies that address the coevolution between different dynamical processes in a static network [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. In cases where cascading dynamics are coupled with the evolution of the network structure, it is essential to understand the coevolutionary dynamics of the network topology and threshold dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the prior research in coupled spreading dynamics on complex networks has conventionally operated under the assumption that information or diseases can exclusively disseminate through direct contact relationships between two individuals [24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, beyond these individual direct contact relationships, the high-order interactions collectively generated by multiple individuals also exert a noteworthy influence on the transmission patterns and rates of information or infectious diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%