2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cognitive Ecology of Stimulus Ambiguity: A Predator–Prey Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of wax moths, however, it is the difference in the temporal structure of conspecific calls (ultrasonic clicks delivered at a rate of 80-100/s) and bat calls (short pulses at rates of < 30/s) that can be used for discrimination, despite their similar spectra (Greenfield and Weber 2000). For a more general treatment on how stimulus ambiguity shapes animal decisions, see Leavell and Bernal (2019).…”
Section: A More Naturalistic View For Sensory Coding Of Bat Predator Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of wax moths, however, it is the difference in the temporal structure of conspecific calls (ultrasonic clicks delivered at a rate of 80-100/s) and bat calls (short pulses at rates of < 30/s) that can be used for discrimination, despite their similar spectra (Greenfield and Weber 2000). For a more general treatment on how stimulus ambiguity shapes animal decisions, see Leavell and Bernal (2019).…”
Section: A More Naturalistic View For Sensory Coding Of Bat Predator Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decision-making is vulnerable to misinformation because deciphering uncertain information is cognitively taxing (1,2). Although heuristic approaches (or rules of thumb) can reduce cognitive costs (3), they can result in misguided and costly decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, when negotiating information-rich environments, many decision makers are thought to become "Bayesian updaters" (4), using both previous experience and new information to guide optimal choices. Information that proves useful or reliable motivates positive future responses, while useless or unrewarding information is filtered into the perceptual background and ignored thereafter (1). Tactical misinformation, or "fake news," can succeed if it diverts the selective attention of decision makers by changing the perceived value of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual variability may manifest in a variety of ecological processes that are based on genetic diversity or the plastic expression of phenotypic traits driven by heterogeneous experiences. Organisms may differ in their metabolic rate and energy allocation (Careau et al 2008), sensory perception and responses to stimuli (Leavell and Bernal 2019), assessments of risk (Peacor et al 2020), and diet specialization (Melián et al 2014). Optimal foraging theory predicts utilization of the relatively most valuable portion of the resource pool; however, divergence in valuation criteria driven by alternate phenotypic traits can promote unique resource specialization patterns at the individual level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%