2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-007-9345-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cognitive Escape Scale: Measuring HIV-related Thought Avoidance

Abstract: Cognitive escape provides a model for examining the cognitive processes involved in escaping from thoughts of HIV/AIDS in a population of men who have sex with men (MSM). This investigation presents psychometric information and validation data on the Cognitive Escape Scale (CES), a measure of HIV-related cognitive avoidance. This study also examined the associations between the CES and self-report measures of theoretically related constructs, including HIV-related worry, sensation-seeking, depressive symptoms,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, despite a higher perceived seriousness of HIV among men with a greater percentage of CAI partners in the previous year in South Africa, perceived risk (Australia and Brazil) and threat (Brazil and South Africa) were lower among participants in some countries. The discordance between sexual risk taking and perceptions of HIV seriousness, risk, and threat may reflect some degree of cognitive dissonance or HIV fatalism among these participants [34,35]. The knowledge of treatment as prevention (TasP) may be another reason for a reduced risk perception among men with a higher percentage of CAI, with the assumption that an undetectable viral load equates to an inability to transmit HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, despite a higher perceived seriousness of HIV among men with a greater percentage of CAI partners in the previous year in South Africa, perceived risk (Australia and Brazil) and threat (Brazil and South Africa) were lower among participants in some countries. The discordance between sexual risk taking and perceptions of HIV seriousness, risk, and threat may reflect some degree of cognitive dissonance or HIV fatalism among these participants [34,35]. The knowledge of treatment as prevention (TasP) may be another reason for a reduced risk perception among men with a higher percentage of CAI, with the assumption that an undetectable viral load equates to an inability to transmit HIV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's cross-sectional assessment does not establish causality between AUDs and suboptimal ART adherence, yet it is reasonable to expect that AUDs negatively influence adherence for numerous reasons, including intoxication impairing one's capacity to plan for or remember dosing requirements [86], living in precarious conditions with lower ART access [87], alcohol consumption used to reduce ART-related side effects [88,89] and intentional “skipping” ART when drinking, due to misconceptions about drug interactions [90-92]. Additional research is needed to clarify the behavioral, environmental, and circumstantial conditions under which alcohol use is likely to influence adherence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the magnitude of the effect of alcohol on adherence to ART may be affected by alcohol users having misconceptions of the possible detrimental interactions between alcohol and medications (Brigido et al, 2001;Kalichman et al, 2009;Sankar, Wunderlich, Neufeld, & Luborsky, 2007), and the use of alcohol to reduce the impact of the negative effects of HIV/AIDS (McKirnan, Ostrow, & Hope, 1996;Nemeroff, Hoyt, Huebner, & Proescholdbell, 2008). Despite the limitations in methodology used to estimate the burden of HIV/AIDS due to non-adherence to ART attributable to alcohol consumption, the finding is still valid that alcohol has a large impact on HIV/AIDS mortality due to people not adhering to ART.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%