2011
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words

Abstract: This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS). The use of title words to elucidate the cognitive structure of LIS has been relatively neglected. The present study addresses this gap by performing (a) co-word analysis and hierarchical clustering, (b) multidimensional scaling, and (c) determination of trends in usage of terms. The study is based on 10,344 articles published between 1988 and 2007 in 16 LIS jo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
105
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
105
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there has been an almost exponential increase in publications on this subject since the 1990s (Wilson 2008). Currently, the field of IB has achieved its own identity within the ambit of research into library and information science (LIS) (Milojević et al 2011). It is characterized, among other things, by being permeable to the focus of other disciplines, so it is common to find research published with several theoretical contributions and methodologies deriving from disciplines such as psychology, sociology, anthropology and education, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there has been an almost exponential increase in publications on this subject since the 1990s (Wilson 2008). Currently, the field of IB has achieved its own identity within the ambit of research into library and information science (LIS) (Milojević et al 2011). It is characterized, among other things, by being permeable to the focus of other disciplines, so it is common to find research published with several theoretical contributions and methodologies deriving from disciplines such as psychology, sociology, anthropology and education, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] Larivière et al used bibliographic data to analyze 110 years of the field of library and information science and identified major shifts occurring in 1960 and 1990. [23] Other work includes Järvelin and Vakkari, 1990;Milojevic et al, 2011;and Sugimoto et al, 2009. [24][25][26] In addition to works that rely on existing metadata, there are longitudinal studies of domains that use algorithmic techniques to identify topics and then analyze the changes in frequency over time of those same topics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23] Other work includes Järvelin and Vakkari, 1990;Milojevic et al, 2011;and Sugimoto et al, 2009. [24][25][26] In addition to works that rely on existing metadata, there are longitudinal studies of domains that use algorithmic techniques to identify topics and then analyze the changes in frequency over time of those same topics. Smeaton et al used information retrieval and clustering techniques to evaluate 25 years of SIGIR conference papers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to its multi-disciplinarity, the intellectual structure of library and information science has been analyzed by many scholars (Tuomaala, Järvelin, & Vakkari, 2014;Milojević et al, 2011;Zhao & Strotmann, 2008;Åström, 2007;Moya-Anegón, Herrero-Solana, & Jimenez-Contreras, 2006) and the analyses of the field's knowledge structure have been accumulated to the extent where one can obtain the intellectual structure of the library and information science at various points in time. Still, the study of the intellectual structure of a discipline has to be continued because it shows the research trends and developments in the given field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%