2016
DOI: 10.1111/labr.12081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cohort Size‐Wage Relationship in Europe

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also for this group, the decrease of median wages has been a bit stronger for the young than the experienced, which contributes to a widening wage gap pattern. There is some literature analyzing the relationship between education attainment and wages with particular focus on the role of cohort size (e. g. Freeman 1979;Welsh 1979;Berger 1983;Fertig and Schmidt 2004;Morin 2015;Moffat and Roth 2016). The key assumption of the studies is that workers of different ages or experiences are only imperfectly substitutable; therefore, an increase in the size of a specific experience-education group will mainly affect the wages of workers in this group.…”
Section: A Review Of Trends In Education and Wage Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also for this group, the decrease of median wages has been a bit stronger for the young than the experienced, which contributes to a widening wage gap pattern. There is some literature analyzing the relationship between education attainment and wages with particular focus on the role of cohort size (e. g. Freeman 1979;Welsh 1979;Berger 1983;Fertig and Schmidt 2004;Morin 2015;Moffat and Roth 2016). The key assumption of the studies is that workers of different ages or experiences are only imperfectly substitutable; therefore, an increase in the size of a specific experience-education group will mainly affect the wages of workers in this group.…”
Section: A Review Of Trends In Education and Wage Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Easterlin's hypothesis about the effect of relative cohort size on cohort income has received moderate empirical support. A large study of 21 European countries in Moffat and Roth (2013) finds negative effects of cohort size on wages, therefore supporting the Easterlin hypothesis, with the effect being stronger shortly after entering the labor market and stronger for more educated workers. Moffat and Roth note that their findings are consistent with most, but not all, of the prior econometric studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The assumption of perfect substitutability by age implies, for example, that the marginal contribution of an additional 25 year old to a workforce is the same regardless of how many 25 year olds are currently employed-in other words, irrespective of how scarce they are. The assumption of perfect substitution of labor among age cohorts, although still common in demographic-macroeconomic models, has been challenged, tested empirically, and relaxed in a variety of modeling approaches [Levine and Mitchell (1988), Lam (1989), Hamermesh (1993), Kremer and Thomson (1998), Card and Lemieux (2001), Blanchet (2002), Rojas (2005), Guest (2007), Prskawetz et al (2008), Roger and Wasmer (2009), Moffat and Roth (2013)]. Fertig and Schmidt (2003) analyze the effect of imperfect labor substitution by age on wages of large cohorts, which is relevant for the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A drawback with respect to identifying the effect of interest is that the size of an age group within a given spatial unit is arguably endogenous due to self-selection of individuals into highwage areas. Korenman and Neumark (2000) proposed birth rates as an instrument, while other authors have since used the lagged relative size of age groups as exogenous predictors (Skans, 2005;Garloff et al, 2013;Roth, 2016a and2016b). Whereas cross-country migration might be deemed too small to influence the size of nationally defined age groups, endogeneity resulting from self-selection through migration becomes a larger concern when the spatial units that are used to construct the measure of population structure are defined at a sub-national level.…”
Section: Population Structure and Wagesmentioning
confidence: 99%