The collaborative governance networks literature: a comprehensive and systematic review

Morçöl, Göktuğ; Yoo, Eunsil; Azim, Shahinshah Faisal; Menon, Aravind

doi:10.4337/9781789901917.00013

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CEG has garnered significant attention in academic research. Scholars have emphasized the importance of considering both "collaborative governance" and "governing collaboration" in cross-sector collaborations, as these concepts present challenges and tensions that must be addressed to sustain the governance form and maximize collaborative advantages [16,17]. The emergence of these collaborations often necessitates an understanding of the institutional contexts in which they develop.…”

Section: Empirical Studies Of Cegmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis

Denfanapapol,

Setthasuravich,

Rattanakul

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Collaborative environmental governance (CEG) is a tripartite process that engages the government, private sector, and general public in decision-making related to environmental challenges, focusing on fostering more sustainable and efficient solutions. Understanding the specific factors influencing the degree of CEG presents a significant challenge, particularly in developing countries. This study aims to identify and assess the socio-economic determinants affecting the degree of CEG in Thailand, a representative developing country. Utilizing robust panel data models, which are well-suited to handle the complex variability of socio-economic factors, we analyzed provincial-level data from 2017 and 2019. Our findings revealed the associations between the degree of CEG and variables such as the internet access divide, economic activities, income inequality, and budget allocations for environmental activities. This research fills critical gaps in our understanding of how these determinants shape collaborative governance efforts, offering novel insights that challenge existing paradigms and providing actionable recommendations for policymakers striving to enhance environmental governance in developing regions.

show abstract

Section: Empirical Studies Of Cegmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis

Denfanapapol,

Setthasuravich,

Rattanakul

et al. 2024

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Vertical-horizontal Actor Collaboration in Governance Network: A Systematic Review

Hendra,

Prasojo,

Fathurrahman

et al. 2024

Public Organiz Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Governance Networks, Bureaucracy, and Democracy

Morçöl

Shafi

Menon

2022

Perspectives on Public Management and Governance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Are bureaucratic and network forms of organization compatible with democracy? Two observations made in the literature inspire this question: Liberal democracies around the world have been challenged by populist authoritarian movements and leaders, and multicentric forms of governance (i.e., governance networks) are utilized increasingly in public policymaking and service delivery in many of these democracies. Based on these observations, we propose that a conceptual investigation of the possible links between three ideal types of democracy (i.e., liberal, deliberative/discursive, and practice-based democracy) and two ideal types of social organization (bureaucracy and governance networks) can help us to better understand the challenges in public policy making and administration in the early 21st century. In doing so, we adopt Max Weber’s conceptual analytical method of using ideal typical abstractions and understanding their historical contexts. With our conceptual analysis, we demonstrate that governance networks may be problematic for liberal and deliberative forms of democracy and are most compatible with practice-based democracy. We propose that a configurational approach should be used in conceptualizing the relations between the ideal types of democracy and social organization.

show abstract

The collaborative governance networks literature: a comprehensive and systematic review

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis

The Digital Divide, Wealth, and Inequality: An Examination of Socio-Economic Determinants of Collaborative Environmental Governance in Thailand through Provincial-Level Panel Data Analysis

Vertical-horizontal Actor Collaboration in Governance Network: A Systematic Review

Governance Networks, Bureaucracy, and Democracy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About