1989
DOI: 10.1016/0169-8095(89)90059-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The collection efficiency of a cylindrical target for ice crystals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not know what fraction of the crystals that collide with aggregates or other particles succeed in separating from the collision (or dislodge other parts of the larger particle) and in transferring charge. Keith and Saunders () used rods of 0.5‐ to 5‐mm diameter to examine the collision efficiency and probability of separation and bounce off of ice crystals of different sizes and speeds colliding with the rods. For plates >60 μm in size colliding at 3 m/s they found the collision efficiency to be ~1.…”
Section: Charge Transfer From Nonriming Ice‐ice Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know what fraction of the crystals that collide with aggregates or other particles succeed in separating from the collision (or dislodge other parts of the larger particle) and in transferring charge. Keith and Saunders () used rods of 0.5‐ to 5‐mm diameter to examine the collision efficiency and probability of separation and bounce off of ice crystals of different sizes and speeds colliding with the rods. For plates >60 μm in size colliding at 3 m/s they found the collision efficiency to be ~1.…”
Section: Charge Transfer From Nonriming Ice‐ice Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For interactions between snow or ice crystals and graupel in dry‐growth mode, E g , y = 0.01 exp (0.1 T C ), where T C is the temperature in °C. At small crystal diameters, the collision efficiency can become much smaller than unity [e.g., Keith and Saunders , 1989], but this effect is not yet incorporated into the model. Another potential source of error is the assumed very low sticking probability, which results in a high “event probability” (EP; the product ɛ coll ɛ sep , where ɛ sep = 1 − ɛ stk is the separation probability), whereas Jayaratne et al [1983] and Keith and Saunders [1989] determined EP values on the order of 0.2.…”
Section: Thunderstorm Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several laboratory studies investigated the formation of ice crystal aggregates (Hosler and Hallgren, 1960;Hobbs, 1965;Keith and Saunders, 1989). An important parameter is the aggregation efficiency, E agg , describing the probability that a close encounter of two ice crystals results in an aggregation event.…”
Section: Particle-based Aggregation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%