2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.607022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Collective Model of Household Consumption: A Nonparametric Characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This extends earlier work of Cherchye et al (2007, who developed revealed preference conditions for the collective consumption model that do not include such assumptions. As such, these conditions allow for a huge variation of the bargaining weights across periods.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This extends earlier work of Cherchye et al (2007, who developed revealed preference conditions for the collective consumption model that do not include such assumptions. As such, these conditions allow for a huge variation of the bargaining weights across periods.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…U m does not depend on q l ; l 6 ¼ m) or (ii) public consumption within the group. Browning and Chiappori (1998) and Ekeland (2006, 2009) introduced a general collective consumption model that does account for publicly consumed quantities and privately consumed quantities associated with externalities; Cherchye et al (2007 developed the revealed preference condition for this general model. We see more refined experiments that specifically focus on consumption externalities and publicly consumed quantities as an interesting avenue for future research.…”
Section: Collective Rationality Without Bargaining Weight Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demuynck (forthcoming) establishes similar np-completeness results for the sequential choice model of Manzini and Mariotti (2007) and the model of choice by game trees from Xu and Zhou (2007). Finally, Talla Nobibon and Spieksma (2010) nd that verifying the revealed preference conditions of Pareto optimal choice behavior for a two person coalition as derived by Cherchye, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2007) is an np-complete problem. is setting differs from ours in the sense that these conditions are obtained from a revealed preference analysis a là Afriat (1967) and Varian (1982) (i.e.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Further, we show that the inclusion of a dominance can lead to non-trivial restrictions on observed choice behavior. 4 Next, we demonstrate that the inclusion 2 However, there has been a growing stream of research that looks at the testable implications of (weak) Pareto rationalizability in a household consumption setting with private and public goods (see, for example, Apps and Rees (1988) ;Chiappori (1988Chiappori ( , 1992 and Cherchye, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2007). 3 In fact, this result and its proof is very similar to the result of Sprumont (2000, Proposition 1) who showed that weak Pareto rationalizability has no testable implications in the setting of a normal form game.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2 Moreover, following [14], the validity of transitive preferences has been put in question in the literature on behavioral economics. 3 Importantly, the result of [10] implies that such considerations cannot be meaningfully investigated in a setting with not more than two goods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%