“…Further, we show that the inclusion of a dominance can lead to non-trivial restrictions on observed choice behavior. 4 Next, we demonstrate that the inclusion 2 However, there has been a growing stream of research that looks at the testable implications of (weak) Pareto rationalizability in a household consumption setting with private and public goods (see, for example, Apps and Rees (1988) ;Chiappori (1988Chiappori ( , 1992 and Cherchye, De Rock, and Vermeulen (2007). 3 In fact, this result and its proof is very similar to the result of Sprumont (2000, Proposition 1) who showed that weak Pareto rationalizability has no testable implications in the setting of a normal form game.…”