The main concern of this paper is to gain an
insight into two of the most common rhetorical strategies used by
Daniel Defoe as a political journalist in the first decades of
eighteenth-century Britain: boosting and hedging. I draw attention
to these two different persuasive verbal devices employed by the
writer in a sample of Defoe’s political essays published in 1709
excerpted from The Review (1704–1713), one of the
leading journals during the reign of Anne Stuart, when political
propaganda relied heavily on pamphlets and periodicals. The results
obtained reveal that Defoe used language as a political weapon,
resorting to boosting, on the one hand, to make his stance clear,
add emphasis, confer certainty to his arguments, and convince the
readership of the evidence of his statements; and to hedging, on the
other, to soften potential conflicts produced by his assertions,
connect with the readers, and attain persuasion.