1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00020552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combination of a novel stimulatory element in the first exon of the maize Shrunken-1 gene with the following intron 1 enhances reporter gene expression up to 1000-fold

Abstract: Both exon 1 and intron 1 of the maize Shrunken-1 (Sh1) gene individually stimulate expression of reporter genes in transient gene expression experiments if present within the transcription unit. The Sh1 exon 1 mediates a 10-fold increase in activity when inserted at the 5' end of the bacterial chloramphenicol transacetylase (CAT) marker gene in both monocot and dicot protoplasts. The Sh1 intron 1 enhances chimeric gene expression in rice and maize protoplasts approximately 100-fold but inhibits CAT expression … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using this construct, the number of spots in immature aleurone layers increased substantially (Figure 4d). Still, compared with aleurone layers bombarded with the pActl-F construct (McEIroy et al, 1990), which contains the promoter of the constitu- To quantify Ltp2 promoter activity in particle bombardment experiments, a second control plasmid (Maas et al, 1991) containing the LUC gene under the control of the 355 promoter was co-bombarded with the Ltp2-Gus construct. Following incubation on tissue culture medium, protein was extracted from the grains in a buffer that allowed measurement of both LUC and GUS activity (for details, see Experimental procedures).…”
Section: The Ltp2 Promoter Is Transiently Expressed Only In Developinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this construct, the number of spots in immature aleurone layers increased substantially (Figure 4d). Still, compared with aleurone layers bombarded with the pActl-F construct (McEIroy et al, 1990), which contains the promoter of the constitu- To quantify Ltp2 promoter activity in particle bombardment experiments, a second control plasmid (Maas et al, 1991) containing the LUC gene under the control of the 355 promoter was co-bombarded with the Ltp2-Gus construct. Following incubation on tissue culture medium, protein was extracted from the grains in a buffer that allowed measurement of both LUC and GUS activity (for details, see Experimental procedures).…”
Section: The Ltp2 Promoter Is Transiently Expressed Only In Developinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequently observed stimulation of expression caused by plant introns has been termed intronmediated enhancement (IME) (Mascarenhas et al+, 1990)+ The difference in amount of product derived from an intron-containing gene and an otherwise identical intronless construct is typically between 2-and 10-fold but can be significantly more, especially in monocots (Maas et al+, 1991;Zhang et al+, 1994)+ The magnitude of the enhancement varies depending on the promoter, intron, and reporter gene used (Callis et al+, 1987;Luehrsen & Walbot, 1991;Rethmeier et al+, 1998), the sequences that flank the intron (Maas et al+, 1991;Clancy et al+, 1994), and the type of cell or tissue in which expression is determined (Gallie & Young, 1994)+ Even though the high degree of variability makes comparisons between studies difficult, and introns could affect expression in different ways, some common themes have emerged that help to delineate potential mechanisms of IME+ The increase in expression mediated by introns is usually apparent at the level of mRNA accumulation (Callis et al+, 1987;Dean et al+, 1989;Rethmeier et al+, 1997;Rose & Last, 1997;Wang et al+, 2002)+ However, IME is unlike the enhancement caused by transcriptional enhancer elements in that the introns must be located within transcribed sequences and in their normal orientation to boost expression (Callis et al+, 1987;Mascarenhas et al+, 1990;Clancy et al+, 1994)+ The distinction from transcriptional enhancer elements is further supported by the demonstration that the introns tested increase mRNA accumulation without significantly affecting the rate of transcript initiation, as de-termined by nuclear run-on transcription assays (Dean et al+, 1989;Rose & Last, 1997;Rose & Beliakoff, 2000)+ Although introns could elevate steady-state mRNA levels by increasing mRNA stability, the half-life of mRNA from genes with or without an intron has been reported to be the same (Nash & Walbot, 1992;Rethmeier et al+, 1997)+ Thus, the mechanism of IME remains unclear, but presumably operates at a co-or posttranscriptional level+ It is plausible that the enhancement mediated by introns is functionally connected to their recognition and removal by the splicing machinery+ Thus, the features that identify a sequence as an intron and/or participate in spliceosome assembly and the splicing reactions might also be involved in IME+ In Arabidopsis, the only recognizable characteristics of introns are that they have weakly ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positioning of the intron in the natural orientation within the 5Ј portion of the transcription unit is typically required for enhancement (Callis et al, 1987;Mascarenhas et al, 1990;Maas et al, 1991;Clancy et al, 1994;Snowden et al, 1996;Bourdon et al, 2001;Chaubet-Gigot et al, 2001), establishing that introns do not function as traditional transcriptional enhancers. Length (Sinibaldi and Mettler, 1992) and composition of flanking sequences influence the degree of stimulation (Luehrsen and Walbot, 1991;Maas et al, 1991;Clancy et al, 1994). The degree of enhancement is usually greater for relatively weak promoters (Callis et al, 1987;Vasil et el., 1987;Mascarenhas et al, 1990;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%