1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(97)80294-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and methotrexate for primary biliary cirrhosis is not better than ursodeoxycholic acid alone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11,12,21,22 In general, the number of patients assessed was too few, and the duration of therapy too short to provide adequate insight into the long-term effects of such treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12,21,22 In general, the number of patients assessed was too few, and the duration of therapy too short to provide adequate insight into the long-term effects of such treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of patients who have persistent abnormalities under UDCA may progress toward cirrhosis and thus may require adjuvant therapy. So far, three classes of drugs have been tested in combination with UDCA: colchicine, [13][14][15][16] methotrexate, [17][18][19][20] and corticosteroids. [21][22][23][24] Briefly, 1) the benefit of colchicine appeared to be marginal or absent in UDCA-treated patients;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After preliminary encouraging data coming from a pilot study [13], others reported disappointing results. The beneficial effects of MTX in the treatment of PBC, alone or in combination with UDCA, could not be confirmed by randomized clinical trials performed by other groups [7,14,15]. It should be noted, however, that substantial sideeffects were not observed in these studies, probably due also to low doses [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%