1987
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(87)90051-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combined micro- and macro-fracture mechanics approach to engineering problems of strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formula (4) which establishes the relation between fracture toughness and the yield stress can be an example of such relationship. As it has already been mentioned, with the proviso that a change in the yield stress is not caused by changes in the material structure, many experimental evidences were obtained of the validity of formula (4). In support of the above-stated, other works can be mentioned in which relation (4) in one or another particular case was substantially experimentally verified.…”
Section: Relation Of Fracture Toughness To Other Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Formula (4) which establishes the relation between fracture toughness and the yield stress can be an example of such relationship. As it has already been mentioned, with the proviso that a change in the yield stress is not caused by changes in the material structure, many experimental evidences were obtained of the validity of formula (4). In support of the above-stated, other works can be mentioned in which relation (4) in one or another particular case was substantially experimentally verified.…”
Section: Relation Of Fracture Toughness To Other Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The comprehensive thermodynamic definition of the temperature and strain rate influence upon the plastic flow stress as well as upon the fracture toughness, Krc, of low carbon steel with the grain size d = 0.034 mm revealed the relation (4) with n' = -1.5, which corresponds to the work hardening exponent n = 0.25. It follows from this work [25] that in the low temperature plateau range the value of K,, ,, 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Toth et al 8 credit Kalthoff 130 with developing the fracture mechanics concept of dynamic impact response curves and their connection with impact fracture toughness measurements. A continuing research activity is to connect the microstructural aspects of fracturing with macroscopic engineering performances, for example, as investigated by Pisarenko et al 131 who have provided an estimation of the fracture toughness dependence on temperature and strain rate. The researches have important consequences for control of neutron irradiation embrittlement in the nuclear power industries, as was the case for the initial investigations of Cottrell 121 and Petch 122 and as was true for later reviews provided both by Wechsler 132 and by Landes, 133 both giving emphases to testing standards and in the latter case, drawing attention to the comparison of static and dynamic fracture toughness measurements, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ductile-brittle Transition and Fracture Toughness Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other workers have attempted to determine material properties fractographically [21,22,23,24]. The blunting that occurs at the tip of a fatigue precrack when a fracture toughness specimen is loaded to failure manifests itself on the fracture surfaces, producing a stretch zone with clear boundaries, namely a distinct width (stretch zone width, SZW) and height (stretch zone height, SZH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%