2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The combined use of data and expert estimates in population variability analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter situation occurs when an expert's opinion is about an item different from the one for which exposure evidence is available. This class of mixed models is topic of current research and a detailed discussion can be found in Droguett, Groen & Mosleh (2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter situation occurs when an expert's opinion is about an item different from the one for which exposure evidence is available. This class of mixed models is topic of current research and a detailed discussion can be found in Droguett, Groen & Mosleh (2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to circumvent these limitations of both Bayesian and non-fully Bayesian approaches, Droguett, Groen & Mosleh (2004) proposed a fully Bayesian population variability analysis methodology that makes possible the combined use of run-time data (e.g., failures and operational time) and expert opinions resulting in a set of mixed likelihood models. However, this approach is only discussed in the context of these mixed likelihood models and there is no attempt to develop models for cases where either run-time data or expertbased evidence is available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an increase trend in the application of Bayesian networks in fields related to reliability, safety and maintenance (Mahadevan et al, 2001). Bayesian approaches to aggregate expert judgments on probabilities have been extensively investigated in risk and reliability analysis (Mosleh, 1986;Droguett et al, 2004;Podofillini and Dang, 2013). BNs provide a framework for addressing many of the shortcomings of human reliability analysis from a researcher perspective and from a practitioner perspective (Boring et al, 2010;Groth, Swiler, 2013).…”
Section: Bayesian Belief Network Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information obtained from these experts should be combined in a formal way. Clemen and Winkler (1999), Droguett, Groen and Mosleh (2004) claim that formal procedures are increasingly applied to elicit the opinion of specialists. If the data are obtained systematically from well-informed experts in primary and secondary processes, the opinion of experts can offer acceptable precision in quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimations are closed-form solutions and simulations are generated for different levels of masking. Regarding population variability analysis, Droguett et al (2004) provided models based on the FB approach, which can use both observed data and expert judgment. They use a nonconjugate lognormal-Poisson-lognormal likelihood model that considers a continuous parameter space made possible by the MCMC method.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Assessment Of Reliability Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%