The Comet Assay in Toxicology 2009
DOI: 10.1039/9781847559746-00227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comet Assay in Human Biomonitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The congruence of results between the comet assay and other endpoints such as micronuclei or sister chromatid exchanges (SCE), has been one of the principal reasons to increase the use of the comet assay as a biomarker for hazard assessment, particularly in monitoring the effects of occupational hazards [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The congruence of results between the comet assay and other endpoints such as micronuclei or sister chromatid exchanges (SCE), has been one of the principal reasons to increase the use of the comet assay as a biomarker for hazard assessment, particularly in monitoring the effects of occupational hazards [47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most importantly, these tests can help establish correlations between exposure and subsequent illness in individuals -which is often the key observation to prove whether or not a link exists between both (Sexton et al, 2004;Angerer et al, 2007). The advantages of human biomonitoring for the individuals being studied include: identification of exposure, identification of environmental mutagens/carcinogens, and determination of the possible range of susceptibility of humans to specific mutagens and carcinogens (Valverde & Rojas, 2009). In summary, nowadays human biomonitoring of dose and biochemical effect has tremendous utility providing an efficient and cost effective means of measuring human exposure to chemical substances providing unequivocal evidence that both exposure and uptake have been taken place (Sexton et al, 2004;Angerer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introduction 1human Biomonitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of standardized protocols aimed at the periodic detection of early (preferably reversible) biological signs, ie biomarkers which are indicative, if compared with adequate reference values, of an actual or potential condition of exposure, effect or susceptibility, possibly resulting in health damage or disease. Biomarkers are usually more specific and sensitive than most clinical tests, and therefore may be more effective for assessing a causal relationship between health impairment and chemical exposure when a change is first detected in exposed workers [4,10,34].…”
Section: Biological Monitoring In Occupational Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%