The common fisheries policy

Gwiazda, Adam

doi:10.1016/0308-597x(93)90081-d

Cited by 13 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…MAGP III speci"ed reductions in capacity and e!ort by #eet segment rather than for the #eet as a whole. In particular, MAGP III speci"ed capacity reductions of 20 per cent and 15 per cent, respectively, in the demersal and beam trawl sectors over the period 1992}1996 [9,10]. This decision was further modi"ed in 1993, such that the "shing e!ort of those #eets using bottom trawls to "sh for demersal species was to be reduced by 20 per cent between 1994 and 1996.…”

Section: The Multi-annual Guidance Programme (Magp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of differences in technical efficiency of fishing boats for capacity measurement and reduction

Pascoe

Coglan

2000

Marine Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: The Multi-annual Guidance Programme (Magp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implications of differences in technical efficiency of fishing boats for capacity measurement and reduction

Pascoe

Coglan

2000

Marine Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In Brittany the number of jobs plummeted from 25,000 in 1950 to 8,000 in 1992. Today, the catching capacity of Brittany's highly capitalized and efficient artisanal fishing fleet greatly exceeds the reproductive capacity of the fish stocks (Salz 1991;Gwiazda 1993).…”

Section: Subscriptions and Membershipsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trying to Make a Living: Breton Fishers and Late Twentieth Century Capitalism

Menzies

2000

Anthropology of Work Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A comparison of three indices of fishing power on some demersal fisheries of the North Sea

Marchal

Ulrich

Korsbrekke³

et al. 2002

ICES Journal of Marine Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scope of this study is to identify temporal dynamics in fishing power, by deriving three different indices (IFP1, IFP2, IFP3) based on three independent methods. IFP1 is derived from the GLM analysis of the relationship between fishing mortality and fishing effort, assuming that total fishing mortality estimates from XSA (eXtended Survivors Analysis) are accurate. IFP2 is derived from the GLM analysis of the difference between the Log-CPUE of a vessel and the average Log-CPUE of a set of reference vessels, which are chosen with regards to the stability of their Log-CPUE over time. IFP3 is derived from the GLM analysis of the Log-CPUE of a vessel relative to some external survey abundance index. Particular attention is paid to the horsepower and year effects in IFP1, IFP2, and IFP3. This methodology is applied to the Danish, Dutch, English and Norwegian demersal fisheries of the North Sea. The fishing power estimated by all indices increases with horsepower, particularly in relation to target species. Despite less consensus in the estimation of annual variations in fishing power, some important features are highlighted. First, there are cases where fishing power has consistently increased over the period of investigation, possibly through an overall increase in fishing efficiency. Second, there are examples where fishing power has increased relative to one species, and remained constant or even decreased in relation to another one. In the context of mixed-species fisheries, this feature might reveal a shift in fishing tactics.

show abstract

The common fisheries policy

Cited by 13 publications

References 1 publication

Implications of differences in technical efficiency of fishing boats for capacity measurement and reduction

Implications of differences in technical efficiency of fishing boats for capacity measurement and reduction

Trying to Make a Living: Breton Fishers and Late Twentieth Century Capitalism

A comparison of three indices of fishing power on some demersal fisheries of the North Sea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About