2017
DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparative Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Strategies and Collaborative Strategic Reading on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension

Abstract: This study was an attempt to systematically investigate the comparative impact of teaching Metacognitive Strategies (MS) and Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners' Reading Comprehension (RC). The participants were 58 homogenized intermediate level female EFL learners, within the age range of 18-30 (Mage = 24); they were non-randomly selected and were randomly assigned into two experimental groups of 29. One experimental group received MS training based on Anderso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding also confirms several scholars' findings that Metacognitive strategies advance reading comprehension [19,20,30,34,39,41,46,47,52,62,68]. In addition, the finding affirms [15] that Metacognitive strategies enable learners to understand their reading better.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The finding also confirms several scholars' findings that Metacognitive strategies advance reading comprehension [19,20,30,34,39,41,46,47,52,62,68]. In addition, the finding affirms [15] that Metacognitive strategies enable learners to understand their reading better.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It was supported by Grabe, he states that CSR combines cooperative learning and reciprocal teaching. In other hand, Grabe also states that using CSR the learners work in group, activate their prior knowledge, make predictions, monitor their comprehension difficulties, clarify information, restate significance points, summarizing the text, and form proper questions about the text (Nosratinia and Mohammadi 2017).…”
Section: Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making inference is the bridging gaps between the reader and author thoughts. It means absorbing explicit views of the author (Asmara, 2019, Karimi, & Baradan, 2017, Anjum, Pathan, & Shah, 2021.Often the author implies something indirectly rather than expressing it directly.…”
Section: Drawing Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%