The Comparative Effectiveness of Mobile Phone Interventions in Improving Health Outcomes: Meta-Analytic Review

Abstract

Background As mobile technology continues expanding, researchers have been using mobile phones to conduct health interventions (mobile health—mHealth—interventions). The multiple features of mobile phones offer great opportunities to disseminate large-scale, cost-efficient, and tailored messages to participants. However, the interventions to date have shown mixed results, with a large variance of effect sizes (Cohen d =−0.62 to 1.65). Objective The study aimed to generate cumulative knowledge that informs mHealth intervention research. The aims were twofold: (1) to calculate an overall effect magnitude for mHealth interventions compared with alternative interventions or conditions, and (2) to analyze potential moderators of mHealth interventions’ comparative efficacy. Methods Comprehensive searches of the Communication & Mass Media Complete , PsycINFO , Web of Knowledge , Academic Search Premier, PubMed and MEDLINE databases were conducted to identify potentially eligible studies in peer-reviewed journals, conference proceedings, and dissertations and theses. Search queries were formulated using a combination of search terms: “intervention” (Title or Abstract) AND “health” (Title or Abstract) AND “*phone*” OR “black-berr*” (OR mHealth OR “application*” OR app* OR mobile OR cellular OR “short messag*” OR palm* OR iPhone* OR MP3* OR MP4* OR iPod*) (Title or Abstract). Cohen d was computed as the basic unit of analysis, and the variance-weighted analysis was implemented to compute the overall effect size under a random-effects model. Analysis of variance–like and meta-regression models were conducted to analyze categorical and continuous moderators, respectively. Results The search resulted in 3424 potential studies, the abstracts (and full text, as necessary) of which were reviewed for relevance. Studies were screened in multiple stages using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria, and citations were evaluated for inclusion of qualified studies. A total of 64 studies were included in the current meta-analysis. Results showed that mHealth interventions are relatively more effective than comparison interventions or conditions, with a small but significant overall weighted effect size (Cohen d =0.31). In addition, the effects of interventions are moderated by theoretical paradigm, 3 engagement types (ie, changing personal environment, reinforcement tracking, social presentation), mobile use type, intervention channel, and length of follow-up. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive meta-analysis to date that examined the overall effectiveness of mHealth interventions across health topics and is the first study that statistically tested mode...

Mobile health application platform ‘Corrie’ personalises and empowers the heart attack recovery patient experience in the hospital and at home for an underserved heart attack survivor

“…The world of mHealth interventions is at the cusp of a revolution, owing to the rapid adoption of smartphones, smartwatches and other digitally connected health peripherals. In the past few years, researchers have begun to investigate the potential for digital health to enhance the prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment of diseases in nearly all specialties 5–8. mHealth interventions aimed specifically at improving the post-MI recovery process have targeted various aspects of the recovery process, from increasing medication adherence and lifestyle changes, to enhanced vital sign monitoring and digitalisation of cardiac rehabilitation 9–17.…”

<p>Systemic Solutions for Addressing Non-Communicable Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries</p>

“…57 Ongoing patient education and family engagement is also vital-in presence of shortage of health providers, digital and mobile health technology can be used to convey and reinforce information to patients and caregivers. [87][88][89] Costeffective health education should penetrate the targeted populations in remote areas with low health resources and among people, with poor education. 90 Active involvement of youth in health education is recommended as they have the most access to technology and may serve to influence their communities towards better health practices.…”

“…103 The scope may vary from training health providers on the latest clinical recommendations, disease management best practices, creating automated workflows for healthcare delivery as well as leveraging patient data to build predictive algorithms. [87][88][89] Beyond clinical interventions, the financing of healthcare also needs to find sustainable solutionsnew initiatives aimed at reducing out-of-pocket health spends and others aimed at accelerating UHC, are required. 104 While some of these interventions were successful, driving change and engagement at the front end of the patient journey and delivering deep integration into provider tools and workflows remains a challenge.…”

Getting health information to internally displaced youth in Afghanistan: can mobile phone technology bridge the gap?

“…More information is needed on alternative ways to reach displaced youth with health information, particularly in fragile settings. Several programs have succeeded in reaching various audiences with health information through platforms that use mobile phone technology across multiple global contexts 13 – 17 . The exponential growth of mobile phone technology has created opportunities to connect people with information at a scale previously unfathomable and Afghanistan is no exception.…”