2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-014-9416-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparative Effectiveness of Portable Video Modeling vs. Traditional Video Modeling Interventions with Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
9

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Another major consideration relates to how students view videos. Traditionally, videos have been viewed on televisions or computers (Miltenberger & Charlop, 2015); however, researchers are beginning to investigate the effects of VM on smaller, more portable devices such as smartphones and tablets (Blood, Johnson, Ridenour, Simmons, & Crouch, 2011;Cihak, Fahrenkrog, Ayres, & Smith, 2010). Miltenberger and Charlop (2015) compared traditional and portable modes of viewing (i.e., TV versus iPad®) and found that smaller devices lead to slightly slower acquisition, but suggested that research in this area should be continued due to the potential benefits of using portable devices.…”
Section: Vm Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another major consideration relates to how students view videos. Traditionally, videos have been viewed on televisions or computers (Miltenberger & Charlop, 2015); however, researchers are beginning to investigate the effects of VM on smaller, more portable devices such as smartphones and tablets (Blood, Johnson, Ridenour, Simmons, & Crouch, 2011;Cihak, Fahrenkrog, Ayres, & Smith, 2010). Miltenberger and Charlop (2015) compared traditional and portable modes of viewing (i.e., TV versus iPad®) and found that smaller devices lead to slightly slower acquisition, but suggested that research in this area should be continued due to the potential benefits of using portable devices.…”
Section: Vm Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the benefits of an adapted alternating treatments design is that different skills may be targeted, as opposed to a traditional alternating treatments design in which the same target skill is measured under different intervention conditions. However, due to unforeseen issues with students having increased ability levels with certain target skills, all students did not complete all of the same skills, which is typically (but not always) the case with adapted alternating treatment designs (Miltenberger & Charlop, 2015;Taber-Doughty et al, 2011). Ideally, all participants should have completed all of the same skills allowing for the equal distribution of VM+P&R, CVM+P&R, and P&R across the target skills.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies have documented benefits of introducing videos via handheld devices for teaching individuals with DD (e.g., Burke et al, 2013). Second, there are mixed results in the literature regarding the effects of VP on small and large screens among individuals with DD Mechling & Ayres, 2012;Mechling & Youhouse, 2012;Miltenberger & Charlop, 2015). This study provided additional support for studies that showed the effectiveness of VP presented on large screens (e.g., Mechling & Ayres, 2012).…”
Section: Paper Two Extended Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…For example, videos were used for supporting students' behavior (Mason et al 2013;) and for fostering their social skills (Hirsch et al 2019;Kennedy and Swain-Bradway 2012), even to the ones with multiple difficulties (Kanfush and Jaffe, 2019). The foundations of this instructional technique lie in the principles of observational learning (Miltenberger and Charlop 2015). The anticipated behaviors/skills (the ones that are modeled) are presented in a video clip, the child watches it, and then has the opportunity to practice them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%