2017
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2017.1404394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative effects of cumulative and unitary SAFMEDS terms in an introductory undergraduate behavior analysis course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four reviewed studies (Adams et al., 2018; Cihon et al., 2012; Meindle et al., 2013; Urbina et al., 2019) systematically assessed different aspects of the SAFMEDS procedure. For example, Cihon et al.’s (2012) data showed that student‐ and instructor‐generated flashcards resulted in relatively similar quiz scores, with slight differences favoring instructor‐generated cards.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The four reviewed studies (Adams et al., 2018; Cihon et al., 2012; Meindle et al., 2013; Urbina et al., 2019) systematically assessed different aspects of the SAFMEDS procedure. For example, Cihon et al.’s (2012) data showed that student‐ and instructor‐generated flashcards resulted in relatively similar quiz scores, with slight differences favoring instructor‐generated cards.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adams et al. (2018) demonstrated that practicing with slices (a reduced number of cards per deck) resulted in better outcomes than practicing with whole decks. Collectively, SAFMEDS showed increases in the rate of correct responding during intervention; however, the retention of information and the likability of the procedures was less than favorable (see Adams et al., 2018; Cihon et al., 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following the use of the SAFMEDS strategy in class to focus on building fluency of basic numeracy skills, approximately 90% of the children in Hunter et al's (2016) study indicated they would like to continue using the strategy. Moreover, when provided with a choice between Individualized Descriptive and Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) assignments, Think Aloud Pair Problem Solving (TAPPS), and the SAFMEDS strategy, only 26.3% of Adams et al's (2018) sample rated SAFMEDS as their favorite undergraduate course activity. Whilst these findings provide some insight into people's attitudes toward the SAFMEDS strategy they did not explore the reasons underlying why some would choose to engage "with it and others" would not.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%