1991
DOI: 10.1067/mva.1991.33241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative evaluation of three-dimensional magnetic resonance for carotid artery disease

Abstract: Conventional angiography is the current standard for the evaluation of carotid artery disease. The excellent resolution of this invasive study is offset by the potential for contrast-related, embolic, and puncture site complications. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography may offer a noninvasive diagnostic alternative. We examined this possibility by performing both conventional angiography and three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in 13 patients. Cervical duplex scans were also obtained i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from four studies using three dimensional time of flight techniques were included, 21 29 39 40 together with six sets of results (from five articles 20 24 28 31 33) obtained by using two dimensional time of flight. Q* was 90% (81% to 99%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results from four studies using three dimensional time of flight techniques were included, 21 29 39 40 together with six sets of results (from five articles 20 24 28 31 33) obtained by using two dimensional time of flight. Q* was 90% (81% to 99%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six articles did not report age range. 25 27 29 34 35 38 Eight articles stated that asymptomatic patients were included, 16 18 2729 31 32 40 and 18 articles gave no information about symptoms. 16 17 19 – 26 28 – 30 3337…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'2 Previous studies comparing magnetic resonance angiography with conventional angiography have often quoted high correlation coefficients as an indication of good agreement. [13][14][15][16] The correlation coefficient measures the strength of a relation between two variables, not the agreement between them, and it is possible to produce high correlation coefficients for data that seem to be in poor agreement. '2 Problems also arise if the data are divided into several groups-for example, mild (0-29%), moderate (30-69%), severe (70-99%), and occluded (100%) categories, with the frequency of assignments to the same category by each method used as a measure of agreement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between the caliper index, based on residual lumen and common carotid artery measurements, and the visual impression of stenosis was assessed by linear regression and Pearson's product moment correlation. 15 Caliper (MRA-DSA) 0 9 (-0 3 to 2-2) 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3-D reconstruction technique has been investigated in carotid artery imaging employing various modalities and has demonstrated some encouraging findings. [23][24][25][26] Whether volume-rendered 3-D ultrasound reconstruction could allow better appreciation of the stenotic lesions and accurate assessment of the severity of stenosis of the cervical carotid artery is not known. Neither is the impact of endarterectomy on the volumetric properties of the regional carotid artery fully understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%