1978
DOI: 10.1071/zo9780215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparative serology of marsupialia, and a classification of marsupials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
3
3

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
43
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of allozymes [15] and mitochondrial 12/16SrRNA+tRNA-valine sequences [16], [17] favoured Macropus monophyly, to the exclusion of W. bicolor . Meanwhile, serology [18], microcomplement fixation [19] and DNA-DNA hybridization [20] tended to favour W. bicolor falling within Macropus , albeit often in different positions. Mitochondrial (mt) Cytb and nuclear Selenocysteine tRNA [21] did not clearly resolve affinities between the subgenera, while Protamine P1 [22] favoured grouping W. bicolor with M. rufogriseus , leaving not only Macropus , but also M. (Notamacropus) paraphyletic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses of allozymes [15] and mitochondrial 12/16SrRNA+tRNA-valine sequences [16], [17] favoured Macropus monophyly, to the exclusion of W. bicolor . Meanwhile, serology [18], microcomplement fixation [19] and DNA-DNA hybridization [20] tended to favour W. bicolor falling within Macropus , albeit often in different positions. Mitochondrial (mt) Cytb and nuclear Selenocysteine tRNA [21] did not clearly resolve affinities between the subgenera, while Protamine P1 [22] favoured grouping W. bicolor with M. rufogriseus , leaving not only Macropus , but also M. (Notamacropus) paraphyletic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies concentrated for the most part on craniodental anatomy and they were both based on hypothetical terminal taxa, where the characters deemed to be ancestral for families are those assigned to ''ancestral'' terminal taxa of that level ; see also S a anchez- Villagra, 2001a). Comprehensive biochemical studies using hybridization techniques started more than two decades ago (e.g., Kirsch, 1977) but molecular studies using discrete characters became available only recently (e.g., Burk et al, 1999;Retief et al, 1995;Springer et al, 1994Springer et al, , 1997. Since the molecular studies are based on terminal taxa at the level of species and only a few species have been included for most families, the morphological and molecular data sets are not ideally compatible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les autres semblent perdus. II n'existe aucun indice concernant la localite precise et la date de capture ni dans la description de l'espece, ni dans l'Historique du Voyage de Decouvertes aux Terres Australes (Peron et Freycinet 1807-1816 Kirsch (1968Kirsch ( , 1977, a partir d'etudes serologiques, montre que la famille des Phalangeridae definie 1'epoque peut en fait etre divisee en trois groupes, selon 1'affinite des genres entre eux : parmi les genres examines, il associe d'une part Trichosurus, Wyulda et Phalanger, d'autre part Pseudocheirus et Schoinobates (= Petauroides), alors que Petaurus est place dans une position relativement isolee. II eleve ainsi au rang de famille (Petauridae) la sous-famille des Petaurinae Gill, 1872, qui comprend -entre autres -les genres Petaurus, Pseudocheirus et Schoinobates (= Petauroides).…”
Section: Phalangista Quoyunclassified
“…Calaby et Richardson (1988 : 53) reprennent cette distinction en retenant les memes criteres, auxquels ils ajoutent la morphologic des dents. Ces deux families sont egalement bien separees par leurs caracteres serologiques (Kirsch 1968, 1977, Baverstock et al 1989) et chromosomiques (Sharman 1989 (Kirsch et Poole 1972. Peron (in Peron et Freycinet, 1807-1816[2 c ed., 1824) ecrit, ä propos du sejour sur « He des Kanguroos », que « nous n'y avons vu que trois especes de mammiferes : Tune appartient au joli genre des dasyures, les deux autres sont nouvelles et paroissent etre les plus grandes de la famille des kanguroos ».…”
Section: Kangurus Gaimardiunclassified