2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1460396917000747
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison between 6 MV Primus LINAC simulation output using EGSnrc and commissioning data

Abstract: IntroductionMonte Carlo calculation method is considered to be the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. The purpose of this research is comparison between 6 MV Primus LINAC simulation output with commissioning data using EGSnrc and build a Monte Carlo geometry of 6 MV Primus LINAC as realistically as possible. The BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc (EGSnrc package) Monte Carlo model of the LINAC head was used as a benchmark.MethodsIn the first part, the BEAMnrc was used for the designing of the LINAC … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MC simulation was suggested to calculate the S p directly to avoid the inaccuracy in measurement by using the IC. [ 24 ]…”
Section: R Esults and Discussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MC simulation was suggested to calculate the S p directly to avoid the inaccuracy in measurement by using the IC. [ 24 ]…”
Section: R Esults and Discussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results shown were valid because previous studies mentioned that the MC simulation was often being used as a benchmark in dose calculation algorithm, especially in small-field dosimetry due to the ability of MC simulation to eliminate the uncertainties of the IC measurement such as lack of LEE, volume averaging effect, and partial source occlusion during simulation process. [ 9 13 24 ] A study by Yani et al . proved that the calculated S cp by the EGSnrc MC simulation was in good agreement with the IC-measured S cp in small-field size 3 cm × 3 cm with the percentage difference between the measured and calculated S cp of 1.8% which was within the tolerance range of 2%.…”
Section: R Esults and Discussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%