2010 Sixth International Conference on Signal-Image Technology and Internet Based Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/sitis.2010.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison of Different Classifiers for Precision Improvement in Image Retrieval

Abstract: In many researches, valuable studies have been done for feature extraction from images data-base, but because of weak classifiers using, good results have not been achieved. In this paper, different classifiers are compared in order to increase image retrieval system precision. Five different classifiers are used in the paper: the support vector-machine, the MLP neural network, the K-nearest neighbor, the rough neural network, and the rough fuzzy neural network. The rough fuzzy neural network and the rough neu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a nonlinear separable feature space is transformed to a linear separable feature space using a Radial Basis Function Kernel (RBF Kernel). The reason for choosing this kernel is RBF kernel has better results in CBIR systems [12]. The perfect situation is that the SVM can find the hyperplane by maximizing the margin between two classes and no example are in the margin i.e.…”
Section: Rough Set Methods To Support Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a nonlinear separable feature space is transformed to a linear separable feature space using a Radial Basis Function Kernel (RBF Kernel). The reason for choosing this kernel is RBF kernel has better results in CBIR systems [12]. The perfect situation is that the SVM can find the hyperplane by maximizing the margin between two classes and no example are in the margin i.e.…”
Section: Rough Set Methods To Support Vectormentioning
confidence: 99%