2019
DOI: 10.23960/ujet.v8.i4.201912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison of English Teaching Learning Technique Using Crossword Puzzle Game and Scrabble Game in Improving Vocabulary Mastery at the Second Grade of SMPN 5 Bandar Lampung

Abstract: The objectives of this research are to find out whether there is significant difference of students’ vocabulary mastery taught through crossword puzzle and scrabble game and to know which technique is better for students. The subject of this research is two classes at SMPN 5 Bandar Lampung, it is class VIII F and VIII H. This research was analyzed using SPSS 22.0. The result showed that there is no significant different. It could be seen from the increase of students’ mean score from pre-test to post-test and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the findings described in this research were taken and adapted from the studies conducted within 2011-2020 about the implementation of substitution drill in teaching grammar which were by Jayanti (2011), Jubhari (2018), and Maisyaroh (2019, Purwito (2011), Hikmah (2019, Pujiana (2019), Rahawi (2020), Fernando (2011, Yupti (2011), Rahayu (2019). There are ten research results that can be described in the following table.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the findings described in this research were taken and adapted from the studies conducted within 2011-2020 about the implementation of substitution drill in teaching grammar which were by Jayanti (2011), Jubhari (2018), and Maisyaroh (2019, Purwito (2011), Hikmah (2019, Pujiana (2019), Rahawi (2020), Fernando (2011, Yupti (2011), Rahayu (2019). There are ten research results that can be described in the following table.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%