The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation

Mardani-Kivi, Mohsen; Mirbolook, Ahmadreza; Salariyeh, Mostafa; Hashemi-Motlagh, Keyvan; Saheb-Ekhtiari, Khashayar

doi:10.3944/aott.2013.3015

Cited by 18 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several other authors have found similar results after ACCR with tendon grafts. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] In our study the mean ASES score improved from 58.9 preoperatively to 93.8 postoperatively, with a high median patient satisfaction rating of 9 of 10.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Two-Year Outcomes After Primary Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Millett

Warth

2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

Two-Year Outcomes After Primary Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Millett

Warth

2015

Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The disadvantages of surgery are the requirement for anaesthesia, the risk of infection and the possibility of degenerative arthritis [7, 20]. Superficial wound site infection following AC joint luxation has been reported in literature at rates of 0%–53% [1–3]. In our study, we carried out surgery for all Type III dislocations and observed one superficial infection whom healing by antibiotherapy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

“…As one of the most important joints around the shoulder, injuries to the acromioclavicular joint (AC) are very important, as depending on the degree of injury, they cause restrictions to the daily life of the patient and workforce losses. Although several treatment methods have been described in literature, it has not been fully clarified which type of treatment is recommended for which type of dislocation [1–6]. The degree of injury and the functional expectations of the patient are the primary indicators.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Surgical Treatment of Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Bosworth technique versus Hook Plating

Gümüştaş

Sağlam²,

Kömür

et al. 2018

North Clin Istanbul

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: In this study, it was compared the clinical results of the Bosworth technique and hook plating in acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. METHODS: 44 patients are retrospectively evaluated in this study whom diagnosed as type III AC dislocations and treated by two different surgical methods in two different clinics. The patients were 30 males and 14 females with a mean age of 44 years (range, 18–80 years). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied surgical technique. Group I comprised 25 patients to whom coracoclavicular fixation was applied by using the Bosworth technique. Group II comprised 19 patients to whom acromioclavicular fixation was applied by using hook plate. All patients are evaulated by The University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Score (UCLA) and The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) scoring system. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 23 months (range, 12–42 months). A statistically significant diffference was determined between the surgical groups in respect of the modified UCLA scale (p=0.012) and Quick DASH score (p=0.008). Hook plating group had better clinical results according to Bosworth group in terms of both UCLA and DASH score. A statistically highly significant negative correlation was determined between the UCLA and DASH scores (r=0.677, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Although hook plating had better clinic outcomes compared to Bosworth technique, there is not seen difference between two groups in terms of the time of return to work. Treatment of the AC dislocation should perform early reconstruction for better reduction, fewer complications and higher levels of patient satisfaction.

show abstract

“…Male / Female 5: 1 (1)(2). Although conservative and surgical treatment options have been defined in the treatment of Type III AC joint dislocations, it has not been clarified which method is better (3,4). Dias JJ et al reported that conservative treatment was better than surgical treatment (5).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hook Plate Applications in Type 3 Acromioclavicular Dislocations

Özkan¹,

Adanaş²

2019

Eastern J Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations are caused by sports injuries fall from height or traffic accidents. While the treatment of Type 1 and Type 2 in AC dislocations is conservative, the treatment of Type 4, 5 and 6 is surgery. Treatment of type III dislocations is controversial. In this study, we aimed to investigate the functional results of patients who surgical treatment by using clavicle hook plate in Type III AC joint dislocations 21 patients (18 males, 3 females; mean age 34 years) with Type III AC joint dislocation who were admitted to our clinic between 2015-2017 were treated with clavicle hook plate. The surgical results of the patients at the 6th month were evaluated according to the Constant score. Of the total 21 patient included in the study, n=18 were male (%86), and n=3 were female (%14). All patients were treated with clavicular hook plate. The average follow-up after treatment is 11 months. Functional results were obtained according to Constant scoring. There was no infection after surgery. Plaque irritation occurred in 2 patients and plaque was removed due to prolonged pain. 1 patient had recurrence. Although conservative treatment of Type 3 AC dislocations can provide adequate functional results in the long term, we believe that early results of the surgical treatment using clavicle hook plate is a reliable and effective method especially in the young age group.

show abstract

The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation

Cited by 18 publications

References 20 publications

Two-Year Outcomes After Primary Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Two-Year Outcomes After Primary Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

Surgical Treatment of Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Bosworth technique versus Hook Plating

Hook Plate Applications in Type 3 Acromioclavicular Dislocations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About