2010
DOI: 10.3109/14767051003678200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of fetal behavior in high risk and normal pregnancies assessed by four dimensional ultrasound

Abstract: The difference of FB between the high risk and normal pregnancies was evident. These preliminary results are promising but further studies have to be done before the test could be recommended for wider clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Statistically significant difference for eight out of 10 parameters of KANET has been showed: isolated anteflection of the head, eye blinking, facial expressions (grimacing, tongue expulsion), mouth movements (mouthing, jawing, swallowing), isolated hand movement, hand to face movement, fist and finger movements and GMs. Authors have also confirmed statistically significant, moderate correlation of KANET and ATNAT tests.…”
Section: Prenatal Neurological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…58 Statistically significant difference for eight out of 10 parameters of KANET has been showed: isolated anteflection of the head, eye blinking, facial expressions (grimacing, tongue expulsion), mouth movements (mouthing, jawing, swallowing), isolated hand movement, hand to face movement, fist and finger movements and GMs. Authors have also confirmed statistically significant, moderate correlation of KANET and ATNAT tests.…”
Section: Prenatal Neurological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KANET test has potential to detect and discriminate normal from borderline and abnormal fetal behavior in normal and in high-risk pregnancies, which means that it could become a valuable diagnostic tool for fetal neurological assessment. 55,[57][58][59] However, further studies in a large population are needed before recommending the use of the test in the routine clinical practice. Also, it seems necessary to simplify the test, may be by grouping some of the parameters, making it more applicable as the screening tool for prenatal neurological assessment.…”
Section: Prenatal Neurological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Miskovic et al 70 compared fetal behavior in high-risk (N=116) and normal pregnancies (N=110) using 4D ultrasound applying KANET. The newborns were assessed by ATNAT.…”
Section: Kurjak Antenatal Neurological Test (Kanet)mentioning
confidence: 99%