2017
DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.erj.3.33.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison of Temperament, Character, and Distraction between Deaf and Normal Students

Abstract: The main purpose of present study was to comparing of temperament character and distraction between the deaf and normal students. This research was a causalcomparative study. The statistical population consisted of all students studying deaf and normal in the second half of 2014, the city was Gilan-Gharb (20=N). Due to the limited deaf students' population size, all the deaf student population and 20 normal students are chosen. The demographic characteristics of age and sex matched groups of the deaf students … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the study attentional tests, deaf children took longer time to answer and provided fewer correct responses compared to their hearing peers. Deaf children's scores were lower in attention control [25], attention [18,26], continuous attention and inhibition [29], and working memory [32] compared to the hearing-impaired subjects. The collected data suggested that balance function in the deaf group was significantly lower than that of the hearing group; the difference between them enhanced by increasing the difficulty of assignments (closing the eyes or narrowing the base of support).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the study attentional tests, deaf children took longer time to answer and provided fewer correct responses compared to their hearing peers. Deaf children's scores were lower in attention control [25], attention [18,26], continuous attention and inhibition [29], and working memory [32] compared to the hearing-impaired subjects. The collected data suggested that balance function in the deaf group was significantly lower than that of the hearing group; the difference between them enhanced by increasing the difficulty of assignments (closing the eyes or narrowing the base of support).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%