2021
DOI: 10.52547/aassjournal.929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison of the Difference in Foot Pressure, Ground Reaction Force, and Balance Ability According to the Foot Arch Height in Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the present study were consistent with the studies of Khramtsov et al (2009), Abdulwahab and Kachanathu (2015), and Song et al (2021) [ 33 – 35 ]. The results showed that the static balance is significantly lower in the flexible flatfoot group than in the normal foot group (Table 2 ); in other words, foot biomechanics affects balance and stability in a stationary state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the present study were consistent with the studies of Khramtsov et al (2009), Abdulwahab and Kachanathu (2015), and Song et al (2021) [ 33 – 35 ]. The results showed that the static balance is significantly lower in the flexible flatfoot group than in the normal foot group (Table 2 ); in other words, foot biomechanics affects balance and stability in a stationary state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Song et al (2021) compared the difference in foot pressure, ground reaction force, and balance ability based on foot arch height in young adults; the results showed no significant difference between the peak vertical force in people with flexible flatfoot and regular foot. However, static balance in people with flexible flatfoots was significantly lower than in people with normal feet [ 35 ]. Therefore, the results in the field of foot biomechanical effects on balance and stability are contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the static balance is signi cantly lower in the exible atfeet group than the normal feet group (Table 2). The results of the present study were consistent with the studies of Khramtsov et al (2009), Al Abdulwahab and Kachanathu (2015), Song et al (2021) [21,23,24]. Feet connection with the ankle, knee and hip joints form the kinematic chain of the lower body which regulates the balance of the body in a static and dynamic state.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Al Abdulwahab and Kachanathu (2015) studied the effects of various degrees of foot posture on static balance in healthy adults; the results showed increasing the foot posture index (FPI) has an effect on static balance in healthy people [23]. Song et al (2021) compared foot pressure, ground reaction force, and balance ability in young adults with exible atfeet; the results showed no signi cant difference in peak vertical force, but static balance was signi cantly lower in exible atfeet compared to normal feet [24]. Therefore, the results in the eld of effect of sole foot biomechanics on balance and stability are contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Cote et al (2005), Tong et al (2013) and Pradhan et al (2020) stated that foot posture has no influence on dynamic balance; Abdulwahab and Kachanathu (2015) reported that static balance in healthy individuals is affected by an increase in the foot posture index. The results of a study conducted by Song et al (2021) on foot pressure, ground reaction force, foot posture and balance ability in young individuals with varied foot arch height showed that there was no significant difference in the peak vertical force in individuals with flexible flatfeet and normal feet. However, static balance in people with flexible flatfeet was significantly lower than in people with normal feet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%