2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-6413(02)00305-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of two approaches to numerical modelling of gas-particles turbulent flow and heat transfer in a pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bourloutski et al (2002) later verified both approaches in turbulent gas-particle flows with heat transfer in a pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Bourloutski et al (2002) later verified both approaches in turbulent gas-particle flows with heat transfer in a pipe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The Largangain method provides much more advantages in modelling of dispersed two-phase flows as compared to other well-know methods such as mixed, two-fluid, VOF, level set and their modifications. 23 The Lagrangian approach resolves the motion of droplets in the continuous fluid flow field by taking of all relevant forces into account. This approach considers the droplet phase as a collection of individual discrete particles of certain size represented by centres of spheres.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the addition to the model of conduction heat transfer due to particle-wall collisions is discussed for two multiple impinging jets cases with similar flow and geometric parameters as reported for Yokomine et al's experiments. 12 In Figure 2, the local heat-transfer 6) dA dt coefficient is plotted as a function of dimensionless length (X/W) for two nondimensional jet separation spacing (L/W) values, L/W ) 5 and L/W ) 7. The total heat-transfer rate, Q, over the entire impingement surface (because the confinement surface is wellinsulated) is also plotted for two L/W values with and without inclusion of the conduction heat transfer between the particles and the wall in the model (viz., WS and WOS conditions, respectively) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were compared with available experimental data, and although the model performed well, it was inadequate at high loading ratio. Bourloutski et al compared two theoretical approaches (viz., Eulerian−Eulerian modeling and the Eulerian−Lagrangian approach) for the numerical investigation of turbulent gas−solid flows with heat transfer in a pipe . These studies indicated good predictive properties of the models for turbulent gas−particle suspension flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%