2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of two domain repartitioning methods used for parallel discrete element computations of the hopper discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving particles dynamically change the workload configuration, making parallelization of DEM software much more difficult and challenging. Domain decomposition is considered one of the most efficient coarse-grain strategies for scientific and engineering computations; therefore, it was implemented in the developed DEM code [16,44]. The recursive coordinate bisection (RCB) method from the Zoltan library [48] was used for domain partitioning because it is highly effective for particle simulations [16,48].…”
Section: Parallel Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moving particles dynamically change the workload configuration, making parallelization of DEM software much more difficult and challenging. Domain decomposition is considered one of the most efficient coarse-grain strategies for scientific and engineering computations; therefore, it was implemented in the developed DEM code [16,44]. The recursive coordinate bisection (RCB) method from the Zoltan library [48] was used for domain partitioning because it is highly effective for particle simulations [16,48].…”
Section: Parallel Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain decomposition is considered one of the most efficient coarse-grain strategies for scientific and engineering computations; therefore, it was implemented in the developed DEM code [16,44]. The recursive coordinate bisection (RCB) method from the Zoltan library [48] was used for domain partitioning because it is highly effective for particle simulations [16,48]. The RCB method recursively divides the computational domain into nearly equal subdomains by cutting planes orthogonal to the coordinate axes, according to particle coordinates and workload weights.…”
Section: Parallel Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topological schemes of domain decomposition, such as the multilevel k-way graph partitioning, were previously used for large-scale DEM models. Due to their more complex adaptation to DEM, those methods present lower parallel performance than geometric-based methods (Markauskas and Kacěniauskas, 2015). Hendrickson and Devine (2000) point geometric methods of decomposition as being well suited to particle simulations.…”
Section: Dlbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods work well when the interaction graph does not change frequently or for shared memory systems. However, due to the lack of constant connectivity inherent of this meshfree method, geometric schemes of domain decomposition perform better for distributed-memory systems (Markauskas and Kacěniauskas, 2015). Usually, simple geometric shapes delimit each subdomain, such as that adopted in the recursive coordinate bisection (RCB) (Fleissner and Eberhard, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation