2020
DOI: 10.1080/1540496x.2019.1709819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comparison Study of Liquidity Measurements on the Chinese Stock Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher value of the indicator, the higher the transaction cost incurred. According to studies of Gao et al (2020) and Mdaghri et al (2021), this variable is calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Stock Market Returns and Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher value of the indicator, the higher the transaction cost incurred. According to studies of Gao et al (2020) and Mdaghri et al (2021), this variable is calculated using the following equation:…”
Section: Stock Market Returns and Liquiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CPQS measure is a low-estimator of bid-ask spread which is computed using daily closing bid and ask prices. It is considered a good proxy to capture the effective bid-ask spread (Fong et al, 2017;Gao et al, 2020).…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective spread is utilised as the second dependent variable in measuring market tightness, generally derived from the bid-ask spread. Chung and Zhang (2014) introduced that the CPQS is used in this study as the best approximation to convey the market tightness in estimating the bid-ask spread (Gao et al, 2020). However, aligned with market depth, this measurement also has the opposite direction.…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%