2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The compensation and capitalization models: A test of two approaches to individualizing the treatment of depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
125
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it may be beneficial to assess for dispositional hope in parents of children with cancer to identify those at greater risk. Capitalization- and strengths-based therapeutic approaches may also be beneficial (Cheavens, Strunk, Lazarus, & Goldstein, 2012; Sheridan & Burt, 2009), and clinicians can build upon this strength in parents using specific strategies to enhance hope (e.g., Gum & Snyder, 2002) and facilitate growth during this challenging life event. For those parents who do have lower dispositional hope, they may benefit from cognitive-behavioral interventions to enhance hope (e.g., Cheavens, Feldman, Gum, Michael, & Snyder, 2006; Lopez, Floyd, Ulven, & Snyder, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it may be beneficial to assess for dispositional hope in parents of children with cancer to identify those at greater risk. Capitalization- and strengths-based therapeutic approaches may also be beneficial (Cheavens, Strunk, Lazarus, & Goldstein, 2012; Sheridan & Burt, 2009), and clinicians can build upon this strength in parents using specific strategies to enhance hope (e.g., Gum & Snyder, 2002) and facilitate growth during this challenging life event. For those parents who do have lower dispositional hope, they may benefit from cognitive-behavioral interventions to enhance hope (e.g., Cheavens, Feldman, Gum, Michael, & Snyder, 2006; Lopez, Floyd, Ulven, & Snyder, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal here is to help clients to learn and to CHANGING PERSONALITY TRAITS 21 reinforce new behaviors and skills such as compensatory or coping skills and to learn to behave in new social roles (practice). It is likely that the clients and the interventionists' preference will determine which route to change they use initially (Cheavens, Strunk, Lazarus, & Goldstein, 2012;Flückiger & Grosse Holtforth, 2008). Most important, however, both routes may result in lasting changes (Flückiger et al, 2013;Grawe, 2004).…”
Section: Multiple Intervention Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using interventions that fit closely with identified strengths is in line with the capitalization model of interventions, which posits that treatment is more effective when it focuses on channeling participants’ strengths rather than remediating their deficits (Wingate et al, 2005). Recent empirical work found greater improvements in depressive symptoms using a capitalization approach (targeting a relative strength) compared to a compensation approach (targeting a relative weakness) (Cheavens et al, 2012). These empirical findings, in combination with the saliency of present moment focus to older adults, suggest that the benefits of mindfulness-based interventions in aging warrant additional attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%