Computational Methods in Lanthanide and Actinide Chemistry 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118688304.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complete‐Active‐Space Self‐Consistent‐Field Approach and Its Application to Molecular Complexes of the f‐Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the overall temperature dependence of χ M T in the 2–150 K range as well as the magnetization curve at 2 K for magnetic fields stronger than 5 kOe are not well reproduced (Figures S19 and S20), suggesting that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues calculated ab initio are not in good agreement with the microstates of the J = 15/2 ground state manifold of Er . It is noteworthy that similar discrepancies between experimental and ab initio CASSCF-calculated low-temperature χ M T values and magnetization isotherms have been reported for other Er III compounds. , These discrepancies appear to be particular for Er III among the trivalent lanthanoid ions and could be due to the limited size of the atomic basis set for Er III or to a contribution of dynamical electron correlation that is not accounted for in CASSCF/RASSI calculations. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the overall temperature dependence of χ M T in the 2–150 K range as well as the magnetization curve at 2 K for magnetic fields stronger than 5 kOe are not well reproduced (Figures S19 and S20), suggesting that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues calculated ab initio are not in good agreement with the microstates of the J = 15/2 ground state manifold of Er . It is noteworthy that similar discrepancies between experimental and ab initio CASSCF-calculated low-temperature χ M T values and magnetization isotherms have been reported for other Er III compounds. , These discrepancies appear to be particular for Er III among the trivalent lanthanoid ions and could be due to the limited size of the atomic basis set for Er III or to a contribution of dynamical electron correlation that is not accounted for in CASSCF/RASSI calculations. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…34,83 These discrepancies appear to be particular for Er III among the trivalent lanthanoid ions and could be due to the limited size of the atomic basis set for Er III or to a contribution of dynamical electron correlation that is not accounted for in CASSCF/RASSI calculations. 43,84 Utilizing an alternative CF approach, a satisfactory rationalization of the INS transitions observed for Er D can be achieved by fitting the experimental INS data to the parameters of a simplified CF Hamiltonian based on extended Stevens operators. 68 The fitting of the experimental INS data was carried out using as a background the phonon spectra of Y D collected at 10 and 50 K (Figure S16) with the Y D data at 10 K scaled to match the intensity of the phonon region in Er D at 5 K. On the basis of a purely axial CF Hamiltonian (eq 2) it is not possible to rationalize the observed INS peaks.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metals were selected for two reasons. First, many studies have concluded that the covalent contribution to bonding in the actinide series peaks at either U or Pu. , Second, cerium is commonly used as a nonradioactive analogue for plutonium. Thus, understanding how it differs from actinides is crucial for detailing how 4f and 5f elements diverge in terms of their electronic structures. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proper selection of this active space is crucial to obtain reliable multiconfigurational wave functions and corresponding energies. Unfortunately, this delicate selection is mostly achieved by tedious trial-and-error procedures, [23][24][25] several empirical guidelines, 19,23,26,27 and chemical intuition, 23,25,28,29 a term that lacks a clear definition in this context. Obviously, this is a not at all satisfactory situation for a highly advanced ab initio method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%