2014
DOI: 10.1002/jcd.21410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complete Arcs of PG(2,31)

Abstract: We obtained a full computer classification of all complete arcs in the Desarguesian projective plane of order 31 using essentially the same methods as for earlier results for planes of smaller order, i.e., isomorph‐free backtracking using canonical augmentation. We tabulate the resulting numbers of complete arcs according to size and automorphism group. We give explicit descriptions for all complete arcs with an automorphism group of size at least 20. In some of these cases the constructions can be generalized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4 may be of some use in classifying or at least constructing large arcs computationally. See [6], [7] and [10] for recent computational results regarding arcs. To classify arcs of size q + k − r one would need to classify arcs of size k + r. If one could classify arcs of size k + r then one could quickly check for each arc to see if M 1 has a vector of weight one in the column space, for each projectively distinct arc G. In the positive case, this would then rule out the possibility that G can be extended to an arc of size q + k − r. In the negative case, one can then extend the arc to an arc H of size k + r + 1 and check to see if M 2 (calculated using H) has a vector of weight one in the column space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1.1, Theorem 1.2 and Theorem 1.4 may be of some use in classifying or at least constructing large arcs computationally. See [6], [7] and [10] for recent computational results regarding arcs. To classify arcs of size q + k − r one would need to classify arcs of size k + r. If one could classify arcs of size k + r then one could quickly check for each arc to see if M 1 has a vector of weight one in the column space, for each projectively distinct arc G. In the positive case, this would then rule out the possibility that G can be extended to an arc of size q + k − r. In the negative case, one can then extend the arc to an arc H of size k + r + 1 and check to see if M 2 (calculated using H) has a vector of weight one in the column space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (2, ) for a certain value of . For =2 see (22)(23)(24)(25), for =3 see (26)(27)(28), and for n ≥ 4 see (29-31).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For q odd the situation is quite different. The combination of computer aided calculations (see for example the articles by Coolsaet and Sticker [9,10] and Coolsaet [8]) with theoretical upper bounds (see Section 2) were not enough to complete the classification of complete arcs of size q − 1.…”
Section: Bounds On Arcs Contained In Low Degree Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [14,Theorem 10.33], there are 15 values of q, all odd and satisfying q 31 (q = 31 has since been ruled out by Coolsaet [8]), for which it is not yet determined whether an arc of size q − 1 is complete or not. We can now complete the classification of planar arcs of size q − 1.…”
Section: Bounds On Arcs Contained In Low Degree Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation