2019
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1610099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complete mitochondrial genome of sponge Halichondria sp. (Demospongiae, Suberitida, Halichondriidae) from Dok-do

Abstract: The mitogenome sequence of Halichondria sp. was determined for the first time in this study. Specimens were identified as a new species belonging to genus Halichondria and more detailed taxonomic study is ongoing. Circular complete mitogenome is 19,687 bp in length, containing 14 proteincoding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and 25 transfer RNAs (tRNAs). Nucleotide composition of mitogenome consists of 28.9% A, 15.1% C, 21.9% G, 34.1% T, revealing high content of A þ T similar to the other Suberitid sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2019 ), and the nucleotide composition had high content of A + T (63.5%) similar to other Suberitid sponges (Kim et al. 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 2019 ), and the nucleotide composition had high content of A + T (63.5%) similar to other Suberitid sponges (Kim et al. 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“… 2007 ) but identical to that of Halichondria (Kim et al. 2017 , 2019 ). The difference is accounted for by repeats of trnM, trnR and trnS in T. hoshinota .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, an extensive overlap of spicule sizes in different species has been documented [2]. Molecular data used in phylogenetic studies includes complete mitochondrial genomes of several Halichondria species [45][46][47] and mitochondrial and ribosomal markers [48,49]. The classification of genus Halichondria, as defined in [2], is still in need of a major revision at an ordinal level [35,50], as classification based on morphology disagrees with phylogenetic analyses using molecular data.…”
Section: Morphology Taxonomy and Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%