2017
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2017.1310609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complete mitochondrial genome of the Critically Endangered Angelshark, Squatina squatina

Abstract: Here, we describe the first mitochondrial genome of the angelshark, Squatina squatina. The genome is 16,689 bp in length with 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA genes, and a non-coding control region. Base composition of the mitogenome has an A + T bias (62.9%), seen commonly in other elasmobranchs. This genome provides a key resource for future investigations of the population genetic dynamics and evolution of this Critically Endangered shark.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the increased interest in angel sharks, the mitochondrial genome has recently been described for several species, including S. formosa (Corrigan et al, 2016), S. japonica (Chai et al, 2016), S. nebulosa (Gao et al, 2016) and S. squatina (Fitzpatrick et al, 2017), whilst Gaida (1995)…”
Section: Stock Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increased interest in angel sharks, the mitochondrial genome has recently been described for several species, including S. formosa (Corrigan et al, 2016), S. japonica (Chai et al, 2016), S. nebulosa (Gao et al, 2016) and S. squatina (Fitzpatrick et al, 2017), whilst Gaida (1995)…”
Section: Stock Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To apply several species delimitation methods to infer MOTUs, our samples were combined with COI sequences from 19 Squatina nominal species (Table 2, Table S1) obtained from the public repository BOLD (www.boldsystems.org, accessed on 5 February 2021), GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/, accessed on 5 February 2021), and from the literature [5,35,36,43,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. The set of DNA fragments were chosen following two criteria: (1) the location of sampling mentioned in the public database (e.g., country, province, region, sector, exact site, coordinates or FAO fishing zones) and ( 2) length of the DNA fragment (i.e.,~610 bp).…”
Section: Species Delimitation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%