2012
DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complex contribution of NOS interneurons in the physiology of cerebrovascular regulation

Abstract: Following the discovery of the vasorelaxant properties of nitric oxide (NO) by Furchgott and Ignarro, the finding by Bredt and coll. of a constitutively expressed NO synthase in neurons (nNOS) led to the presumption that neuronal NO may control cerebrovascular functions. Consequently, numerous studies have sought to determine whether neuraly-derived NO is involved in the regulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF). Anatomically, axons, dendrites, or somata of NO neurons have been found to contact the basement memb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
(325 reference statements)
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is released by many neuronal subtypes, including fast-spiking interneurons. 174 ROS react with nitric oxide, and may finally generate more harmful reactive nitrogen species. 173 Therefore, the maintenance of ROS at low levels is critical for normal cell function.…”
Section: Perspective: Metabolic and Oxidative Stress In Fast-spiking mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is released by many neuronal subtypes, including fast-spiking interneurons. 174 ROS react with nitric oxide, and may finally generate more harmful reactive nitrogen species. 173 Therefore, the maintenance of ROS at low levels is critical for normal cell function.…”
Section: Perspective: Metabolic and Oxidative Stress In Fast-spiking mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms for such variation are unclear, but are likely to involve differences in both signalling pathways and vascular anatomy [73]. For example, the involvement of NO varies between brain areas, both in terms of the magnitude of its contribution and whether it acts to mediate or modulate neurovascular coupling (as discussed in [74]). There also appear to be regional differences in the involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) subtypes, as the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP decreases stimulation-evoked BOLD responses more in rat subcortical regions than in the neocortex [75].…”
Section: (D) Central Neuromodulatory Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms underlying neurovascular coupling in a given situation will vary depending on expression patterns of key enzymes and receptors across different brain areas, as well as the local and global circuit dynamics engaged by a given task. For example, different subtypes of inhibitory interneurons presumably alter neurovascular coupling not only by the release of different vasoactive molecules, but also by regulating the activity of the local network (Lecrux and Hamel [3] in this issue; [74]), affecting glutamate release and second messenger production in excitatory neurons and astrocytes. As discussed above, the activity of these circuits and the reactivity of blood vessels may also be affected by global brain state as expressed in different levels of monoaminergic and cholinergic tone.…”
Section: (D) Central Neuromodulatory Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, current in vitro models of vasospasm that use whole blood to simulate SAH 8,9 are technically unsuitable for investigation of the autoregulation of cerebral vessels, mostly because presence of blood prevents visualization of a pressurized vessel and diameter measurements. We developed a novel, highly reproducible and technically uncomplicated model of vasospasm in vitro using a perfusion myograph and videomicroscopy to investigate the myogenic response of cerebral vessels -one of the main mechanisms of cerebral blood flow autoregulation 10,11 .…”
Section: Cerebral Delayed Vasospasm Is a Severe Complication Followinmentioning
confidence: 99%