The complex interface between economy and healthcare: An introductory overview for clinicians

Abstract

In a period of generalized economic crisis, it seems particularly appropriate to try to manage a continuing growing sector such as healthcare in the best possible way. The crucial aim of optimization of available healthcare resources is obtaining the maximum possible benefit with the minimum expenditure. This has important social implications, whether individual citizens or tax-funded national health services eventually have to pay the bill. The keyword here is efficiency, which means either, maximizing the benefit from a fixed sum of money, or minimizing the resources required for a defined benefit. In order to achieve these objectives, economic evaluation is a helpful tool. Five different types of economic evaluation exist in the health-care field: cost-minimization, cost-benefit, cost-consequences, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the principal methods used for economic evaluation in healthcare. Economic evaluation represents a starting point for the allocation of resources, the decision of the valuable investments and the division of budgets across different health programs. Moreover, economic evaluation allows the comparison of different procedures in terms of quality of life and life expectancy, bearing in mind that cost-effectiveness is only one of multiple facets in the decision making-process. Economic evaluation is important to critically evaluate clinical interventions and ensure that we are implementing the most cost-effective management protocols. Clinicians are called to fulfill the complex task of optimizing the use of resources, and, at the same time, improving the quality of healthcare assistance.

The Choice of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: A Radiologist’s Responsibility between Pharmaceutical Equivalence and Bioethical Issues

“…Despite massive developments in medicine, and progress in healthcare systems in the last few decades, the public health service is facing countless problems and health service reform is a matter of intense public debate [28,29]. Many problems in healthcare management are related to bureaucracy, mismanagement, general disorganisation, and spiralling costs [30].…”

Ordering Cost-Effectiveness Management Studies in Healthcare: A PRISMA-Compliant Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis

“…The issue of effectiveness in healthcare has often been debated and is often associated with patient safety, playing a particular role in international debates (Bennington, 2010;Mosadeghrad, 2014). The issue of patient safety, however, is often faced with a progressive rationalization of spending due to fewer available resources and more significant health needs to respond (Atella et al, 2019;Citroni et al, 2019;Ottolini et al, 2016). In addition to the above, the progressive increase in the number of inhabitants in the coming years is added, with a likely need to evaluate the organizational and allocative choices accurately (Campra et al, 2019;Passel & D'Vera Cohn, 2008, pagg.…”

Organisational and financial consequences of the early discharge of patients treated for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection and osteomyelitis in infectious disease departments in Greece, Italy and Spain: a scenario analysis

“…Efficiency may mean either maximising the benefit from a fixed sum of money or minimising the resources required for a defined benefit. This has important social implications when considering tax-funded National Health Services (NHS): healthcare budgets are limited and spending in one area is unavoidably at the expense of investment in another area, so efficiency can be interpreted as ensuring that the benefits obtained exceed the benefits forgone 2…”