2008
DOI: 10.1080/10573560802491208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complex Nature of Reading Fluency: A Multidimensional View

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
144
0
14

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
10
144
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion basically suggests that when the decoding is automatic or quick, it allows readers to focus on meaning constructions. Therefore, it is predicted that less fluent readers are poor in grasping the meanings of what they read because they need to focus more on sounding out words or making guesses rather than comprehending the text (Hudson et al, 2009). The findings from this study added to support the notion that these relationships are also relevant in an ESL context.…”
Section: Discussion Implication and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This notion basically suggests that when the decoding is automatic or quick, it allows readers to focus on meaning constructions. Therefore, it is predicted that less fluent readers are poor in grasping the meanings of what they read because they need to focus more on sounding out words or making guesses rather than comprehending the text (Hudson et al, 2009). The findings from this study added to support the notion that these relationships are also relevant in an ESL context.…”
Section: Discussion Implication and Recommendationsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For example, phonological decoding skill is acknowledged to be an important skill supporting word reading (Share, 1995), while oral language skills, vocabulary, working memory, inference and integration skills have been found to be additionally important for reading comprehension (Cain, Oakhill & Bryant, 2004;Ricketts, Bishop & Nation, 2007). Furthermore, sight word automaticity and processing speed have been associated with reading speed and fluency measures (Hudson, Pullen, Lane & Torgesen, 2009). Therefore, just as there are differences in the cognitive skills supporting these different components of reading, this study will examine whether reading motivation and reading habits predict some reading skills to a greater extent than others.…”
Section: Do Motivational Influences Vary For Different Aspects Of Reamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature suggests that oral reading fluency (ORF) refers to reading text quickly, accurately, with good prosody, and with comprehension (e.g., Abdelbari, 2011;Hasbrouck & Tindal, 2006;Hudson, Lane, & Pullen, 2005;Hudson, Pullen, Lane, & Torgesen, 2008;Hussien, 2011;Kuhn, Schwanenflugel, & Meisineger, 2010;McKenna, 2002;McKenna & Stahi, 2003;McShane, 2005;Pikulski & Chard, 2005;Rasinski, 2004;Valencia et al, 2010). Previous research, usually in English, provides considerable knowledge about oral reading accuracy, oral reading rate and prosody as indicating variables in ORF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%