2012
DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2011.628720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complex Relationship Between Peacebuilding and Terrorism Approaches: Towards Post-Terrorism and a Post-Liberal Peace?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the idea of exceptionalism becomes a thing of the past; a terrorist attack is always imminent and extraordinary security measures become permanent, routinized, and pervasive in all policy domains. Especially affecting the Global South, we find the new security-development nexus and the state-building and liberal peace-building narrative in the development of new wars and the making of the global order (Chandler, 2010;Duffield, 2005;Richmond & Tellidis, 2012). It is "[…] the interaction of liberal peacebuilding and orthodox terrorism approaches [that] has tended to reinforce securitised states" (Richmond & Tellidis, 2012, p. 121).…”
Section: Beyond the Speech-act: Examining Everyday Practices Of Secur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the idea of exceptionalism becomes a thing of the past; a terrorist attack is always imminent and extraordinary security measures become permanent, routinized, and pervasive in all policy domains. Especially affecting the Global South, we find the new security-development nexus and the state-building and liberal peace-building narrative in the development of new wars and the making of the global order (Chandler, 2010;Duffield, 2005;Richmond & Tellidis, 2012). It is "[…] the interaction of liberal peacebuilding and orthodox terrorism approaches [that] has tended to reinforce securitised states" (Richmond & Tellidis, 2012, p. 121).…”
Section: Beyond the Speech-act: Examining Everyday Practices Of Secur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the post-9/11 order, policy and politics have legitimated ‘an array of illiberal practices’ (such as Guantánamo, extraordinary renditions, etc.) ‘through claims about necessary exceptions to the norm’ (Neal, 2006: 31) and in the name of perpetual extraordinary security (Fisher, 2013); proscription of organisations and groups have strengthened constructions of a dangerous Other (Jackson et al, 2011; Jarvis and Legrand, 2016; Jarvis and Lister, 2014); targeted and victimised entire communities (Jarvis and Lister, 2013a; Lindekilde, 2012), often counter-productively (Pantazis and Pemberton, 2009), or without tangible improvements in security (Amoore and de Goede, 2008); and debilitated (Richmond and Tellidis, 2012) or even outlawed attempts for peacebuilding (Haspeslagh, 2013). ‘Dissident’ research on terrorism, as Stump and Dixit (2013: 4) call it, has also provided alternative methodologies that ‘challenge established “truths” about terrorism and political violence’ (Toros, 2013: 57), unmask the insecurities that counterterrorism produces in daily life (Ryan, 2013) and highlight how visual methods may uncover instances where iconography serves to legitimise the portrayal of the state as the ‘good guy’ that saves the lives of people threatened by ‘evil terrorists’ (Debrix, 2013).…”
Section: Norwegian Dissensus the ‘Spatial Turn’ And The Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further he explains "positive peace" as a prerequisite for sustainable peace in peacebuilding. The structural developments in peace attainment contain numerous establishments such as relief, rehabilitation and reconciliation (Richmond and Tellidis, 2012). Galtung's model (1969) comes closest to conflict analysis and conflict transformation synthesis.…”
Section: Justice Positive Peace and Reconciliationmentioning
confidence: 99%