2019
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1673303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complex relationship between pre-stroke and post-stroke language abilities in multilingual individuals with aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In connected-language production, multilingual individuals with aphasia are likely to score higher on a variety of communicative measures if their output in either language is combined and considered correct, as compared to when only what they produced in the target language is scored as correct (Lerman, Goral, and Obler 2020). This is similar to what has been found with neurologically healthy multilingual speakers who have varying levels of proficiency in their two languages (e.g.…”
Section: Interpreting the Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In connected-language production, multilingual individuals with aphasia are likely to score higher on a variety of communicative measures if their output in either language is combined and considered correct, as compared to when only what they produced in the target language is scored as correct (Lerman, Goral, and Obler 2020). This is similar to what has been found with neurologically healthy multilingual speakers who have varying levels of proficiency in their two languages (e.g.…”
Section: Interpreting the Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Multilingual persons who are immersed in one of their languages and use another of their languages with limited frequency may experience language attrition in the lessused language, that is, a deterioration of their linguistic and communicative abilities (e.g. Lerman, Goral, and Obler 2020;Schmid 2013). Changes associated with language attrition are often subtle in people who were adults before changing their language environment and use.…”
Section: Obtaining Language Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asking people to rate their abilities will thus be a very time-consuming process or a crude approximation. Researchers studying multilingual speakers with aphasia continue to improve the field's understanding of the reliability of self-reported proficiency, the wording that best elicits the target information, and the inter-relation between language proficiency and language use [9].…”
Section: Language Proficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several variables have been implicated in determining patterns of impairment and recovery in multilingual PWA. These include variables related to the type of multilingualism, such as age of language acquisition, relative pre-stroke proficiencies of each language, and frequency of language use and exposure, as well as variables related to the stroke, such as site and size of the brain lesion and the time elapsed since the aphasia onset [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contributions in this issue, stimulated by different multiethnic neurorehabilitation environments across the world, advance the foundations in aphasia services in multiethnic populations in three important directions by (1) increasing our understanding of the factors that explain post-stroke language abilities in bilingual individuals, (2) extending neurocognitive accounts of bilingualism to aphasia in bilingual speakers, and 3exploring culturally secure methodologies to be used in assessment and treatment contexts in culturally diverse adult neurorehabilitation services. In the first article in this Special Issue, to facilitate the often difficult process of interpreting post-stroke language profiles in bilingual persons with aphasia (Kuzmina et al, 2019), Lerman et al (2020) review multiple case studies to propose that interpretive accuracy in aphasic language analysis in bi-/multilingual speakers may be enhanced by integrating multiple factors, including pre-stroke language proficiency, language exposure and use, post-stroke language impairment, post-stroke language practices, and nature of the brain lesion. Next, in line with current influential neurocognitive accounts implicated in aphasic language performance in bilingual individuals (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%