“…Generic Combinations. In the context of combining decision procedures for CSPs, the notion of generic combinations has been introduced in [BG20]. However, others have studied such structures before (for instance in [Cam90, KPT05, BPP15, LP15]).…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All generic combinations of A 1 and A 2 are isomorphic (Lemma 2.8 in [BG20]), so we will speak of the generic combination of two structures, and denote it by…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.5 Proposition 1.1 in [BG20]. Let A 1 and A 2 be countably infinite ω-categorical structures with disjoint relational signatures.…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, b n ), because both (Q; <) and A do not have algebraicity. Now we apply the first statement of Lemma 2.7 in [BG20] for each k ∈ [n] to c, s k,1 , s k,2 . This yields, for each k ∈ [n], a solution s k to ψ k ∧ φ(x k , y k , u k , v k ).…”
The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) of a first-order theory T is the
computational problem of deciding whether a given conjunction of atomic
formulas is satisfiable in some model of T. We study the computational
complexity of CSP$(T_1 \cup T_2)$ where $T_1$ and $T_2$ are theories with
disjoint finite relational signatures. We prove that if $T_1$ and $T_2$ are the
theories of temporal structures, i.e., structures where all relations have a
first-order definition in $(Q;<)$, then CSP$(T_1 \cup T_2)$ is in P or
NP-complete. To this end we prove a purely algebraic statement about the
structure of the lattice of locally closed clones over the domain $Q$ that
contain Aut$(Q;<)$.
“…Generic Combinations. In the context of combining decision procedures for CSPs, the notion of generic combinations has been introduced in [BG20]. However, others have studied such structures before (for instance in [Cam90, KPT05, BPP15, LP15]).…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All generic combinations of A 1 and A 2 are isomorphic (Lemma 2.8 in [BG20]), so we will speak of the generic combination of two structures, and denote it by…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2.5 Proposition 1.1 in [BG20]. Let A 1 and A 2 be countably infinite ω-categorical structures with disjoint relational signatures.…”
Section: The Conditions Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, b n ), because both (Q; <) and A do not have algebraicity. Now we apply the first statement of Lemma 2.7 in [BG20] for each k ∈ [n] to c, s k,1 , s k,2 . This yields, for each k ∈ [n], a solution s k to ψ k ∧ φ(x k , y k , u k , v k ).…”
The constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) of a first-order theory T is the
computational problem of deciding whether a given conjunction of atomic
formulas is satisfiable in some model of T. We study the computational
complexity of CSP$(T_1 \cup T_2)$ where $T_1$ and $T_2$ are theories with
disjoint finite relational signatures. We prove that if $T_1$ and $T_2$ are the
theories of temporal structures, i.e., structures where all relations have a
first-order definition in $(Q;<)$, then CSP$(T_1 \cup T_2)$ is in P or
NP-complete. To this end we prove a purely algebraic statement about the
structure of the lattice of locally closed clones over the domain $Q$ that
contain Aut$(Q;<)$.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.