2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00224-013-9443-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Complexity of Compressed Membership Problems for Finite Automata

Abstract: In this paper, a compressed membership problem for finite automata, both deterministic (DFAs) and non-deterministic (NFAs), with compressed transition labels is studied. The compression is represented by straight-line programs (SLPs), i.e. context-free grammars generating exactly one string. A novel technique of dealing with SLPs is employed: the SLPs are recompressed, so that substrings of the input word are encoded in SLPs labelling the transitions of the NFA (DFA) in the same way, as in the SLP representing… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recompression was developed for a specific problem concerning compressed data (fully compressed membership problem for finite automata [30]) and was later successfully applied to word equations [36] and other problems related to compressed representations. The usual approach for word equations (and compressed data in general) is that one tries to extract information about the combinatorics of the underlying words from the equation (compressed representation) and use this structure to solve the problem at hand.…”
Section: Recompressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recompression was developed for a specific problem concerning compressed data (fully compressed membership problem for finite automata [30]) and was later successfully applied to word equations [36] and other problems related to compressed representations. The usual approach for word equations (and compressed data in general) is that one tries to extract information about the combinatorics of the underlying words from the equation (compressed representation) and use this structure to solve the problem at hand.…”
Section: Recompressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide class of compressed membership problems (deciding eval(P) ∈ L) is studied and discussed in Jeż [16] and Lohrey [20]. In the case of words over the unary alphabet, w ∈ {a} * , expressing w with an SLP is poly-time equivalent to representing it with its length |w| written in binary.…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remarkable fact about this latter compressor is that in contrast to [9,23,39,40] it does not use the LZ77 factorization of a string (which makes the compressors from [9,23,39,40] not suitable for a generalization to trees, since LZ77 ignores the tree structure and no good analogue of LZ77 for trees is known), but is based on the recompression technique. This technique was introduced in [19] and successfully applied for a variety of algorithmic problems for SLP-compressed strings [19,22] and word equations [13,24,25]. The basic idea is to compress a string using two operations:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%