2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2013.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The complexity of rerouting shortest paths

Abstract: The Shortest Path Reconfiguration problem has as input a graph G with unit edge lengths, with vertices s and t, and two shortest st-paths P and Q . The question is whether there exists a sequence of shortest st-paths that starts with P and ends with Q , such that subsequent paths differ in only one vertex. This is called a rerouting sequence. This problem is shown to be PSPACE-complete. For claw-free graphs and chordal graphs, it is shown that the problem can be solved in polynomial time, and that shortest rer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We distinguish the following two cases: First, we assume that each internal vertex of T is b-tight. Then we pick S = v 0 v 1 and R = v 1 . .…”
Section: T ∩ M Is Internally 1-reconfigurable To T ∩ N and 2 T ∩ Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We distinguish the following two cases: First, we assume that each internal vertex of T is b-tight. Then we pick S = v 0 v 1 and R = v 1 . .…”
Section: T ∩ M Is Internally 1-reconfigurable To T ∩ N and 2 T ∩ Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then T ∩ M is not internally k-reconfigurable to T ∩ N for any k ≥ 1, since no edges of T ∩ M can be removed and no edges of T ∩ N can be added without violating the degree constraints. If T is b-tight, i.e., 3a is violated, then we choose R = v 1 . .…”
Section: T ∩ M Is Internally 1-reconfigurable To T ∩ N and 2 T ∩ Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconfiguration graphs have been studied for a number of combinatorial problems; the questions asked are typically (as we have seen for colouring) is the graph connected?, what is the diameter of the graph (or of its connected components)?, how difficult is it to decide whether there is a path between a pair of given solutions? Problems studied include boolean satisfiability [13,21],clique and vertex cover [16], independent set [6,20], list edge colouring [17],shortest path [3,4], and subset sum [15] (see also a recent survey [14]). Recent work has included looking at finding the shortest path in the reconfiguration graph between given solutions [19], and studying the fixed-parameter-tractability of these problems [7,18,23,24].…”
Section: (The Answer Is Always Yes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem arises when we wish to find a step-by-step transformation between two feasible solutions of a problem such that all intermediate results are also feasible and each step abides by a fixed reconfiguration rule (i.e., an adjacency relation defined on feasible solutions of the original problem). This kind of reconfiguration problem has been studied extensively for several well-known problems, including independent set [2,5,7,10,11,13,15,19,[21][22][23], satisfiability [9,20], set cover, clique, matching [13], vertexcoloring [3,6,8,23], list edge-coloring [14,17], list L(2, 1)-labeling [16], subset sum [12], shortest path [4,18], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%