1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0142716400005531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comprehension of idioms: The effects of familiarity, literalness, and usage

Abstract: The relationships among the familiarity of an idiom's figurative meaning, the likelihood of its literal meaning (literalness), and its usage were explored. Previous research has been inconsistent in supporting any one model of idiom comprehension, although certain factors have been found to affect reading times of sentences containing idioms. Consistent with this research, familiarity was found to have a significant effect on reading times for sentences containing idioms. A significant new finding is that lite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1
7

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
48
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, familiarity can explain the greater ease with which people typically process literal idiomatic expressions in their figurative rather than literal interpretation (Popiel & McRae, 1988;Schweigert, 1986). Finally, it is well known that familiarity modulates the processing time of idioms, since highly familiar idioms are processed faster than are less familiar ones (Cronk & Schweigert, 1992;Schraw, Trathen, Reynolds, & Lapan, 1988;Schweigert & Moates, 1988). However, whether low familiarity idioms still exhibit the idiom superiority effect has not yet been clarified, and further research is necessary to assess whether the prediction following from the present hypothesisthat the effect should disappear or be very reduced as familiarity decreases-actually holds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, familiarity can explain the greater ease with which people typically process literal idiomatic expressions in their figurative rather than literal interpretation (Popiel & McRae, 1988;Schweigert, 1986). Finally, it is well known that familiarity modulates the processing time of idioms, since highly familiar idioms are processed faster than are less familiar ones (Cronk & Schweigert, 1992;Schraw, Trathen, Reynolds, & Lapan, 1988;Schweigert & Moates, 1988). However, whether low familiarity idioms still exhibit the idiom superiority effect has not yet been clarified, and further research is necessary to assess whether the prediction following from the present hypothesisthat the effect should disappear or be very reduced as familiarity decreases-actually holds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to capture this distinction is to note that the two types of expressionsidioms and controls-differ in terms of familiarity, a variable well known to influence the processing of both individual words and idioms (Connine, Mullennix, Shernoff, & Yelen, 1990;Gernsbacher, 1984;Schweigert, 1986). Obviously, not all idioms are equally familiar; some are more familiar than others, and there is evidence that more familiar idioms are processed faster than less familiar ones are (Cronk, Lima, & Schweigert, 1993;Cronk & Schweigert, 1992). Unfortunately, in the early studies that established the idiom superiority effect, familiarity of the idiomatic strings is not always available (Gibbs, 1980; clichés should all be equally faster than matched control expressions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over a period of three weeks, the performance of the picture group on learning the form of decomposable idioms is significantly better than the performance of the translation group (mean difference. 16) There was a statistically significant difference at the p< .05 level in the scores for the three groups: F(2, 657) = 8.852, p = .000.Also, a one-way ANOVA between groups analysis of variance was conducted to explore the impact of the instruction types on learning the form of decomposable idioms, as measured by the second posttest. There was a statistically significant difference at the p< .05 level in the scores for the three groups: F (2, 657) = 9.336, p = .000.…”
Section: Tests Of Within-subjects Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eğitimde Whatsapp kullanımı, öğrencilerin öğrenilen konularla ilgili yapılan konuşma ve tartışmalara aktif katılımını teşvik ederek öğrencilerin öğrenme performansını arttırmaya imkân sağlar (Zayed, 2016). Çeşitli araştırmalarda Whatsapp'ın; işbirlikli öğrenme deneyimlerine katkı sağlamak (Bansal ve Joshi, 2014), tekrar ve alıştırma yapmak (Ashiyan ve Salehi, 2016) İngilizce'de Deyim Öğretimi: Bir dili tam olarak anlayabilmek için standart kullanımı dışında istisnai kullanımı da anlaşılmalıdır (Cronk ve Schweigert, 1992;Gibbs, 1987). Dile özgü deyimsel ifadeler de istisnai kullanımlardan biridir.…”
Section: Alanyazınunclassified
“…In order to fully understand a language, one has to understand both its literal and figurative use (Cronk & Schweigert, 1992;Gibbs, 1987). Language-specific idiomatic expressions exemplify figurative use of language.…”
Section: Summary the Effect Of Delivering Concept Cartoons In Mobile mentioning
confidence: 99%