The Comprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) study: design and methods for a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial

Abstract

BackgroundPatients discharged home after stroke face significant challenges managing residual neurological deficits, secondary prevention, and pre-existing chronic conditions. Post-discharge care is often fragmented leading to increased healthcare costs, readmissions, and sub-optimal utilization of rehabilitation and community services. The COMprehensive Post-Acute Stroke Services (COMPASS) Study is an ongoing cluster-randomized pragmatic trial to assess the effectiveness of a comprehensive, evidence-based, post-acute care model on patient-centered outcomes.MethodsForty-one hospitals in North Carolina were randomized (as 40 units) to either implement the COMPASS care model or continue their usual care. The recruitment goal is 6000 patients (3000 per arm). Hospital staff ascertain and enroll patients discharged home with a clinical diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patients discharged from intervention hospitals receive 2-day telephone follow-up; a comprehensive clinic visit within 2 weeks that includes a neurological evaluation, assessments of social and functional determinants of health, and an individualized COMPASS Care Plan™ integrated with a community-specific resource database; and additional follow-up calls at 30 and 60 days post-stroke discharge. This model is consistent with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services transitional care management services provided by physicians or advanced practice providers with support from a nurse to conduct patient assessments and coordinate follow-up services. Patients discharged from usual care hospitals represent the control group and receive the standard of care in place at that hospital. Patient-centered outcomes are collected from telephone surveys administered at 90 days. The primary endpoint is patient-reported functional status as measured by the Stroke Impact Scale 16. Secondary outcomes are: caregiver strain, all-cause readmissions, mortality, healthcare utilization, and medication adherence. The study engages patients, caregivers, and other stakeholders (including policymakers, advocacy groups, payers, and local community coalitions) to advise and support the design, implementation, and sustainability of the COMPASS care model.DiscussionGiven the high societal and economic burden of stroke, identifying a care model to improve recovery, independence, and quality of life is critical for stroke survivors and their caregivers. The pragmatic trial design provides a real-world assessment of the COMPASS care model effectiveness and will facilitate rapid implementation into clinical practice if successful.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02588664; October 23, 2015.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12883-017-0907-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Social work support and unmet social needs in life after stroke: a cross-sectional exploratory study

“…In our opinion, this role does not receive adequate recognition. More research in this field would emphasize the importance of post-acute stroke services [41]. Evaluating the effect of social worker interventions is part of our consecutive MAS-II study (Managing Aftercare for Stroke -A Longitudinal Complexinterventional Study in Post-rehabilitation Stroke Patients, clinicaltrials.gov NCT03097146).…”

Use of health services by elderly people post-stroke: a randomized controlled trial

“…A structured program of care transition from hospital to home reduces the length of hospital stay of the elderly and their readmissions, and increases their satisfaction with care (7) . In the international context, studies have explored the effects of care transition programs on the use of health services by dependent or stroke elderly patients (8)(9)(10)(11)(12) .…”

An integrated hospital-to-home transitional care intervention for older adults with stroke and multimorbidity: A feasibility study

“…9,18 Current Canadian best practice guidelines for managing care transitions following stroke are largely built upon evidence from observational or qualitative studies, or expert consensus. 13 The majority have focused on hospital-based, post-acute care (<3 months) initiatives, including early supported discharge interventions, [19][20][21] while few have examined the role of outpatient or other community-based teams in supporting care transitions beyond the post-acute period. Recent meta-analyses 22 and systematic reviews 23 examining the effectiveness of TC interventions for stroke patients are inconsistent, some reporting benefits and others reporting negative effects, and most have focused predominantly on the management of stroke, with limited attention to the management of other comorbid conditions.…”