The Computational Boundary of a “Self”: Developmental Bioelectricity Drives Multicellularity and Scale-Free Cognition

Abstract

All epistemic agents physically consist of parts that must somehow comprise an integrated cognitive self. Biological individuals consist of subunits (organs, cells, and molecular networks) that are themselves complex and competent in their own native contexts. How do coherent biological Individuals result from the activity of smaller sub-agents? To understand the evolution and function of metazoan creatures' bodies and minds, it is essential to conceptually explore the origin of multicellularity and the scaling of the basal cognition of individual cells into a coherent larger organism. In this article, I synthesize ideas in cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and developmental physiology toward a hypothesis about the origin of Individuality: "Scale-Free Cognition." I propose a fundamental definition of an Individual based on the ability to pursue goals at an appropriate level of scale and organization and suggest a formalism for defining and comparing the cognitive capacities of highly diverse types of agents. Any Self is demarcated by a computational surface -the spatio-temporal boundary of events that it can measure, model, and try to affect. This surface sets a functional boundarya cognitive "light cone" which defines the scale and limits of its cognition. I hypothesize that higher level goal-directed activity and agency, resulting in larger cognitive boundaries, evolve from the primal homeostatic drive of living things to reduce stress -the difference between current conditions and life-optimal conditions. The mechanisms of developmental bioelectricity -the ability of all cells to form electrical networks that process informationsuggest a plausible set of gradual evolutionary steps that naturally lead from physiological homeostasis in single cells to memory, prediction, and ultimately complex cognitive agents, via scale-up of the basic drive of infotaxis. Recent data on the molecular mechanisms of pre-neural bioelectricity suggest a model of how increasingly sophisticated cognitive functions emerge smoothly from cell-cell communication used to guide embryogenesis and regeneration. This set of hypotheses provides a novel perspective on numerous phenomena, such as cancer, and makes several unique, testable predictions for interdisciplinary research that have implications not only for evolutionary developmental biology but also for biomedicine and perhaps artificial intelligence and exobiology.

Science-Driven Societal Transformation, Part I: Worldview

“…If complexity is a measure of problem-solving capacity, then to some degree the opposites are true. An organism or system "complexifies" over time when it faces challenges, opportunities, or environments that it is ill equipped to handle [134][135][136]. With greater complexity come new options, additional flexibility, and expanded information processing.…”

Mechanosensation Mediates Long-Range Spatial Decision-Making in an Aneural Organism

“…Quantitative morphological analysis and an unbiased machine-learning approach revealed that this capability included significant distance in both time and space: small pieces of Physarum were able to detect the presence of objects at a distance of several centimeters, and decide which way to go hours before actually moving in that direction. This reveals a minimum bound on the spatio-temporal boundary of the basal cognition of this organism (Levin, 2019).…”

Why isn’t sex optional? Stem-cell competition, loss of regenerative capacity, and cancer in metazoan evolution

“…The "cells" in these models are Bayesian agents employing active inference (Friston, 2010;; they have both long-term (genetic) and short-term (cellular state) memories, inferential and communication capabilities, and the ability to modify their local microenvironment by moving in space relative to the other cells. They therefore exhibit a kind of "basal cognition" (Baluška and Levin, 2016;Levin, 2019) in the sense of systems that exhibit memories and make decisions about possible outcomes in a contextspecific manner. In these models, communication is cooperative: the cells do not withhold information, provide misinformation, manipulate each other's information processing, or send signals telling other cells to stop dividing or die.…”